It is obvious a I7 needs more cooling than a I5 (ie : higher frequency = more heat load)
In fact, this is a good question : how to archived "good" thermal design in products, when Intel issues "skewed" marketing product specs ?
An exemple ?
I5 8250u - base freq.= 1.6 Ghz / max turbo freq. = 3.4 Ghz
I7 8550u - base freq.= 1.8 Ghz / max turbo freq. = 4.0 Ghz
I7 8650u - base freq.= 1.9 Ghz / max turbo freq. = 4.2 Ghz
But Intel said TDP (thermal design power) is the same for all (15 W) !
They even said configurable TDP-up is the same (25 W) !
How is this possible ? the answer lies with Intel's TDP definition : "average power, in watts, the processor dissipates when operating at Base Frequency with all cores active under an Intel-defined, high-complexity workload"
Then, you can be sure the "high-complexity workload" is not the same for I5 and I7, or there's a change with measurement.
As the T- junction (Junction Temperature is the maximum temperature allowed at the processor die) is 100°C for I5 and I7, you can see the consequences in Andreas' report...
Additionaly, bezels become more thinner every year, brands have to design thermal solutions that perfectly fits for all Intel processor : not easy !
@ Andrea : please, how is this taken into account in your reviews ? This is an issue because when you test and rate a I5 8250U config, people may prefer to order I7 8550/8650, and unfortunately sometime they will not experience the same story...
Thank you