Hi. First, please, excuse my english. Second, congratulations, the reviews are very useful and give us a lot of information.
What i dont undertand, confronting the review of the surface Pro (first version) and this one. The rating here is for a tablet while the surface pro is a convertible. Impression rating is less than Surface pro, but the chasis is the same. Keyboard, is rated same, but new keyboards are retroilluminated (yes, i understand it is an option). Display rating is less, but really is better in this one (isnt it?)
Finally, application perfomance, same rating in two versions, while i read everywhere that this version really runs and feels faster than old one, thanks to the faster ssd, more memory, and the new CPU.
So i cant agree with this ratings table, but reading all details in the full review, i find it very useful and really intreresting, as we are used to read here.
Just i think there are some errors in the ratings table and maybe is because this version is reviewed as a tablet while older surface pro was reviewed as a convertible (the right choice in my opinion).
Thanks and good job!