I liked the review and didn't need to see a comparison against the rest. Thank you.
It is weird, however, that a business laptop includes a discrete GPU. I mean, why compromise the cooling capability for something that just isn't going to be used by most people using this as their primary business tool? The unit suffers from CPU throttling, yet they still put in a GPU that generates the same heat, if not more?
It would be really good to know about why the OEMs make the decisions they make in order to produce the products that eventually get reviewed. Why, for example, do many of the OEMs, at one point or other, create products that shine so well in many areas but eventually fall down in just a few key areas and leave us bewildered? Asking, "what were they thinking"?
Like with the current XPS 15, where an awesome design is let down by a poor trackpad, or excessive CPU throttling?
Or, another product that has an incredible chassis, keyboard and trackpad, only to ship with a very substandard display (um, Razer Blade or DELL Alienware)? Or yet another, like the Acer R7, which could have completed the tablet experience by shipping with a Wacom digitizer and stylus. Same with the DELL XPS 18 - so close yet so far for those that absolutely need a Wacom digitizer and stylus (like me) and feel that the form factor of the 18 is perfect for their use case (reading full pages from PDF textbooks while actively annotating the page being read and taking notes on a blank page next to it).
Yep, it would be awesome if Notebook Check could write an article which could provide some keen insights into the world of the PC manufacturer. Thanks Notebook Check :)