News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 review - The fanless M4 SoC is years ahead of the competition

Started by Redaktion, March 11, 2025, 17:00:26

Previous topic - Next topic

Redaktion

Apple has given its MacBook Air 15 the lightning-fast M4 SoC, which is still cooled passively. It also features a new 12 MP webcam and a new colorway. However, its 60 Hz display remains unchanged and there is no matte option—but the Air is now $100 cheaper.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-MacBook-Air-15-M4-review-The-fanless-M4-SoC-is-years-ahead-of-the-competition.976933.0.html

Dawnstar

Apple: remove the notch, use a 120Hz IPS panel without frame rate control / temporal dithering, allow the screen to open 180 degrees. Thanks in advance.


PandaBear19

What's up with Apple screens? Battery life drop at max brightness websurfing compared to regular websurfing test is massive, ASUS lunar lake laptops with OLED screens lose almost twice as less battery life in similar comparison. So strange when just recently OLED screens were big battery drainers for laptops when compared to LCD. 

Aras

Given that the power consumption decreases a lot, from 18 Watts to 5 Watts due to the fanless design, the test should have included the CPU and GPU performance over time.

Also, it matters a lot whether the benchmarks are run when the processor and the chassis is cool or warm.

AZ


Sceglitelotu

Very nice article!
I found very useful the data on the energy consumption under different loads and i think it would be great if also the temperature readings were done under the same circumstances( not just idle and load but also during wifi usage).

XinisterMR

In terms of repairability, as Ifixit shows, it has modular ports (most competitors don't), a battery that uses pullable adhesive, removable trackpad and day 1 repair manuals. It has parts pairing but a repair score of 0 just doesn't seem fair, there was no explanation for this score either.

Mahmoud

I think there is a mistake in the display's Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey. Based on the fall and rise times, I think the total is 23.2 ms, not 33.2 ms. Either this or the fall and rise times are wrong in the device screenshot.

Dont_Look_Up

Like @Aras mentioned already below, the most important performance measurement for a passively cooled is missing:

Performance deterioration over continuous R15 test loop is missing!

Another favourable treatment to Apple? (After bad screen response times, short warranty, ridiculous expensive upgrades, no repair by third party allowed...) All these do not matter for the reviewers in the final score?

For me the worst of all is the lock in software ecosystem and no option to install other OSes like Linux. But that is just me.


Biscuity

I'm intrigued by the black level and contrast on the display. There seems to have been some marked improvements over the last two MacBook Air generations (16% and 13% improvements respectively since last years M3 Air).

Do these improvements apply to the 13" MacBook Air as well?

Thanks

Lon

Why doesn't Notebookcheck take into account more types of flickering than just PWM?

Apple laptops are known to cause eye strain due to temporal dithering and FRC, which are used to achieve that P3 color gamut by rapidly switching between colors.

Quick Reply

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview