News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Anker's smallest and lightest 'Nano 100W Wall Charger' with ActiveShield 2.0 now available on Amazon

Started by Redaktion, September 06, 2024, 00:11:52

Previous topic - Next topic

Redaktion

Anker's new Nano 100W Wall Charger (model A2679) offers a compact and lightweight design, delivering 100W of power via a USB-C port. Featuring ActiveShield 2.0 for safety and a foldable plug, it is 17% smaller and 29% lighter than its predecessor. The charger is available in black and white options on Amazon for $44.99.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Anker-s-smallest-and-lightest-Nano-100W-Wall-Charger-with-ActiveShield-2-0-now-available-on-Amazon.884628.0.html

Weeeee


anan

Quote from: Weeeee on September 06, 2024, 06:18:06100W kinda needs 3 ports to be useful, otherwise a single port really needs only 45-65W.
It is actually quite difficult to implement more than one port if you want them to support any type of fast charging. Basically, you have to duplicate many components for the second port. And most of the time those chargers that have 3 ports actually have two chargers inside with few common components. That increased the price and size.
And with proliferation of phones that can charge at high wattage this charger is quite useful.

MrMLK

Quote from: anan on September 06, 2024, 09:55:22
Quote from: Weeeee on September 06, 2024, 06:18:06100W kinda needs 3 ports to be useful, otherwise a single port really needs only 45-65W.
It is actually quite difficult to implement more than one port if you want them to support any type of fast charging. Basically, you have to duplicate many components for the second port. And most of the time those chargers that have 3 ports actually have two chargers inside with few common components. That increased the price and size.
And with proliferation of phones that can charge at high wattage this charger is quite useful.

I think the point Weeee was making is that if you are only going to include one USb-C port, a smaller 65W charger makes more sense than a 100W port.

I don't know of many (any) phones that charge faster than 65W, which is another argument for limiting the max current.

This is a nice technical achievement, but really only useful for folks who travel with a high end laptop, need to to charge at the maximum speed, and don't bring anything else with them. I personally don't know anyone like that.

Quick Reply

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview