This test illustrates once again the almost unavoidable problem with laptop tests: a true apples to apples comparison especially of endurance on battery power is really hard. In this test here, the previously tested (very good!) 7840u Model had a display with lower resolution, which by itself (if panel type and brightness settings are equal) will lower power draw in tests like battery life on Wi-Fi. So, should this Meteor Lake model be dinged for having a few minutes less of WiFi time? It's still pretty similar. Now, we have two decent choices, which is better than before!
Some of the criticisms about the cooling solution and throttling under high load are objectively correct, but IMHO not applicable to the use case this type of laptop is typically purchased for. Anyone who buys this kind of light and portable laptop (without a dGPU!) to run demanding games or editing 4K videos, all while on battery is a bit, let's say, optimistic. The dimensioning of the cooling solution in this Framework laptop is appropriate for the way most buyers will use it: office apps and web browsing, with some occasional light gaming.
What I would have liked to see (read) is a comment on the availability or lack of an option for a bigger battery. I would gladly put up with another 100 - 150 g of weight in exchange for a 95 or 99 Wh battery, if that's available. But then, that's just me.