Well, now it is clear that Zen5 of this version will not reach 5200+ points in CBR15 even at 110W, like 7945HX, i.e. Zen4 is more energy efficient than Zen5, it is a fact. Funny? Sad.
On the one hand, the owner gets a much more efficient memory controller than in Zen4 (and probably 64GB soldered is available only in Zen4 Phoenix and Zen5), on the other hand, at 80W PL1 7945HX would have given out figures in the region of 4500-4700 in CBR15, which is clearly faster for the kind of work for which such series are bought...
Let's move on - 16", but again a cropped keyboard. Although the target group is like creative "artists", they probably don't need a numpad..
The consequence of the low weight and thin case was increased noise even at rest, as well as pre-critical heating with the exhaust of hot air under the screen and onto the screen.
This author, as usual, misleads readers about the "infinite black level". In reality, such a black level is possible only on AMOLED panels with the "True Black HDR XXX" nameplate, and here it is not, which means the real contrast (and the level black) for AMOLED screens are a priori shameful, so Asus did not receive a certificate-nameplate for this screen.
Another strange Frankentshane from Asus at a clearly inflated price of at least 800-1000 euros. But at least it showed us for the first time the limits of performance, or rather scalability depending on TDP. We learned from this review that at high consumption levels, Zen5 Strix Point 100% loses in pure performance (at least on old code, of which there is a lot) to the 45 series Zen4.
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar