This was a valid article. The commentary was worthwhile and accurate. I like LTT and find it interesting that the video was edited and re-uploaded. I feel that LTT as a channel lives in a very charmed area of tech commentary. Their access to high end gear is envied throughout YouTube. Just look at all of the LTT clones, some valid taking Mr. Sebastian's formula and tweaking it to move the niche industry of YouTuber tech-talk forward while others just soullessly imitate the quirky tone and irreverence and hope a company like Lenovo sends them some free tech to "review/promote."
I think ultimately, if one looks deeply enough, LTT has more eyes on it than its humble roots betray. Keeping such a powerful outlet accountable is valuable and newsworthy.
There are some minutiae-based pieces of news here on the website (how many nits a certain phone claims to provide in direct sunlight vs. actual performance for example) that aren't validated by the mistaken party so quickly, if at all. If I don't find an article here newsworthy, I will move on knowing that someone somewhere has been enriched by its existence.
YouTube is massive in its influence and calling out a big player *is* totally something I'd like to see more of here and online.