HP is always ruining potentially good generic models.
Of course, the most important thing is the lack of power via the corner round and reliable power plug. Which does not stick out idiotically perpendicular to the body and with which it is comfortable to use a laptop on beds/sofas for right-handers (let me remind HP that 90% of the world's population are right-handed, and not left-handed at all).
What is the problem with making 2 power inputs, as is done correctly in the Acer Aspire 5 2023? You can lie on your bed by connecting it via a safe, reliable and angled round power plug that does not stick out to the side, and when traveling, if anyone needs it, use USB-C. Yes, in the end, damn it - why not make two USB-C with input power, but at least one in the back, and not on the side? Or symmetrically on the left and right, so that it is convenient for both right-handers and left-handers, and not just left-handers, as it is now? You yourself are reducing your sales significantly, because many right-handed people refuse such an idiotic decision on power sockets.
Again the stupid power button inside the keyboard next to Backspace! Stop this mockery of ergonomics! Fire the person responsible for this and hire a new designer! The narrowed row Esc, F1..F12 is written about in the review, which also significantly worsens the speed of blind text entry.
Again, a morally outdated, grainy-looking, crappy fhd screen (I would never believe in the contrast of 2000:1+ on IPS), and even with low-frequency PWM.
There should be a choice of 4k@120Hz IPS with guaranteed (in specifications and in batches) 1500:1+ in a semi-matte version. And the real response time is no more than 7ms on G2G/B2W. This is all you need for a high-quality business book screen, where working with perfectly clear text is the main task.
And it's nice to have new lines with the same 4k@120Hz panels in the 17" 16:10 and 18" 16:10 class.
The price of the solution is certainly high, taking into account 1 module of 32GB. But HP, like the rest, simply makes money on this. At least, unlike Lenovo's stupid business models, there are always 2 slots. So quickly buy and install a second module for 32, getting a full 64GB (and this is not the limit for Zen4 Phoenix, they support modules for 64 and 128GB, for a total of 256GB, they are just not on sale yet, because Zen4 Phoenix is the only x86 line processors with support for 64 and 128 modules - Intel still does not have such models, and they own 75% of the x86 market, so there is no benefit for RAM manufacturers to make batches only for Zen4 Phoenix, which is extremely rare in mass-produced laptops)
Performance and noise. Performance is normal for a 40W 7940HS, nothing special. What's special is that this time HP did not reduce it, as it usually does by 15-20% relative to others. Thanks for that too.
But the noise under average load (here it is the author's fault that he did not check in dual-channel mode by installing a 32GB module) is more than 2 (two!) times lower than that of the Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 AMD! Bravo if that's the case! Although we must take into account that the memory controller works at half power in single-channel mode and therefore heats up less...
Battery life is also longer, but again we must take into account that the author did not test a full-fledged dual-channel mode with 64GB of RAM, where consumption will be clearly higher.
It should also be noted that based on the throughput in single-channel mode, the efficiency of the AMD memory controller and optimization from HP in the BIOS, even in dual-channel 32+32, will be clearly mediocre. Around 60-65GB/s, instead of 85-89GB/s expected with DDR5 5600.
It is commendable that, in contrast to the poor 720p/fhd cameras, HP was the first to switch to 5MP cameras in laptops. But I would like to have autofocus and better dynamic range. Just compare with smartphones...
In general, HP, like all other manufacturers, continues to create strange Frankensteins, but no one intentionally wants to create an ideal universal business book. For what? After all, having bought it, the owner will use it for as long as possible without updating (after all, everyone likes it and is happy with everything), unless there is really strong progress in new models. So why they deliberately worsen ergonomics, upgrade options and screens is obvious. It seems that the true pleasure of using a good, ergonomically and internally perfect model should raise the long-term reputation of the manufacturer, but who cares about long-term reputation today?