Apple's upcoming Xcode update set to revolutionize developer workflow with AI integration

[El Mao]

"lmao" defending Apple: "8gb is enough" -> ELMAO ELMAO

[lmao]

low-effort bro is supporting himself by pretending he is someone else lmao
grabbing popcorn

[RobertJasiek]

lmao poor apple haters

The language of an Apple defender.

poor go cheater [...] low-quality shitposters

Insults by an Apple defender.

his go cheating app

You make the same mistake as the user A: it is not my software but it is software that also I use.

A software generating Go moves and evaluations of Go moves and Go positions is, first of all, just this: a software generating Go moves and evaluations of Go moves and Go positions. Usually, users of such software use it for these purposes. Only if such use occurs while playing (especially tournament or rated games), it can be cheating. Not only do I not do this but I have also written now adopted Go tournament rules that prohibit AI use while playing and been similarly active for decades.

Similarly, other AIs used for other purposes, such as programming or media creation, are not cheating softwares per se. Cheating is if one uses them while pretending not to use them or while performing an activity that is supposed to be without help by third persons or uneligible tools.

calls llms "interesting version of ai".

You misunderstand. I call only those LLMs interesting that have a sufficient quality. Garbage does not impress me.

envy to people who achieved something real in their life and have money for apple tech makes you do this

Widen the scope of your understanding of the world: it is possible to have game-related jobs. I use aforementioned AI daily to make money. (Needless to say, without using Apple tech for this purpose.)

***

Furthermore, learn that I have mentioned software I understand the best. There must be countless AIs for professional uses but I can evaluate the other AIs easily because I do not use them. I can, however, evaluate Go AIs because I use them and have informed myself about them.

[Neenyah]

lmao poor apple haters

The language of an Apple defender.

I like it how poor is his most creative "insult", lol. Little brain can't think about anything else. Bill Gates is also poor though, that guy can't afford a MacBook and enjoy all benefits of memeOS 😥

[lmao]

Apple defender

Apple defender

say something smart already i am bored lmao
i dont see any "apple defenders" running around and posting low-iq crap in intel and amd news like you hater bros do all the time when you are triggered by the word "apple" in news headlines

I use aforementioned AI daily to make money

HAHA i already figured you are cheating in online tournaments lmao
www.nordicgodojo.eu/post/33/how-to-limit-cheating-in-online-go

evaluate Go AIs

it is not ai, at least learn the terminology before posting your useless low-effort comments under unrelated news about xcode developer ai you've never seen and don't really have any idea about.
who the f*** even cares what you have to say on unrelated topics, 4090 you don't have or your go cheating habits and programs you use for it haha

I like it how poor is his most creative "insult"

maybe it is because i am not here to come up with creative ways to insult people and spread hate like you do lmao
and poor is not an insult, it's just a fact about the origins of your behavior

[RobertJasiek]

Katago plays Go very much stronger than the strongest human Go players who have spent their lifes on studying Go. This is sufficient reason for calling Katago an AI.

When you refer to Antti Törmänen's page Nordic Go Dojo and say "you are cheating in online tournaments", you hit ambiguity of English: you do not mean me but you mean the generic "you", that is, you have found a description that there are some cheating players in online tournaments. Indeed, there are. Not me. Although your citation context tries to suggest the opposite. For others, it is easy to see through your casting doubts scheme by noticing that the referred, linked page is not about me at all.

[lmao]

Katago plays Go very much stronger than the strongest human Go players who have spent their lifes on studying Go. This is sufficient reason for calling Katago an AI.

ai is not about being superhuman, it is about thinking as human lmao.
your app has neural network only for one specific task unlike whats considered a real ai which is doing everything using neural networks.
why you keep commenting for the sake of commenting wth you probably never knew anything about ai except first link in google

you hit ambiguity

lmao i do not hit any ambiguity just showing you i am well aware what those go engines are used for and how they are used to earn money

[AAGUC]

since with their unified memory design Apple silicon is years ahead of x86

They are ahead but this isn't the technical reason. UMA designs have existed decades before Apple started building silicon. Anything with an iGPU is UMA by definition.

People can already run good quality LLMs on any Apple system from M1 up that would be impractical on a base x86 system, though more than 16GB RAM is essential, more than 32GB helpful.

I've made this argument before but I'll repeat it here again. Apple, much like Nvidia charge a lot for memory. The base / entry Mac's with 8GB of ram are useless for such applications. For the same price of a 16GB Mac you can easily get a 32GB windows machine. For the price of a 32GB Mac you can get a 64GB windows machine.

It's true once you start going past 64 GB, to like 96GB-128GB there isn't really anything in the x86 landscape that can compete. But do you know how much such systems cost? $5000. So yes, for that kind of money you can beat an x86 system. I guess you could make the argument "well just stop being poor and low IQ then" but it's irrelevant because who do you is the target audience for such a system? Certainly not amateur hobbyists. The kind of people who require such systems work in big tech firms or startups and work on this professionally / get paid for a living for it. I doubt these people even pay for their work machines. The machine could cost $25k and it still wouldn't matter or affect them since their company is paying for it all.

So yeah, I can see why so many are recommending MBP for LLMs. It makes complete sense if you're getting them for essentially free or are running a corporation/company. For the average end-user tho who isn't so into AI, it doesn't make as much sense.

[RobertJasiek]

ai is not about being superhuman, it is about thinking as human

The scope of AI differs from weak to strong. From barely human-like in specific tasks to - in the future - more capable than mankind.

your app has neural network only for one specific task unlike whats considered a real ai which is doing everything using neural networks.

Welcome to learning that there are different AIs with different scopes. Currently most AIs are task-specific. General AIs equivalent to all capabilities of the human brain do not exist yet. Different AIs achieve their artificial intelligence by different means, such as neural nets, deep learning, reinforcement learning etc. Current abstract game AIs use, in particular, all three of these. There are also AIs that use none of these.

i am well aware what those go engines are used for and how they are used to earn money

There are many more uses of Go AIs than currently you imagine. Currently, the most frequent use by most users is hobby study attempting to improve by playing against the AI or letting it statistically quick-analyse one's own games played earlier. My major use differs: I use the AI to explore moves, variations and positions to help me studying theory of opening or middle game tactics and strategy very much faster than without using AI. (For endgame theory, my mathematical approach is much faster than AI.)

[RobertJasiek]

It's true once you start going past 64 GB, to like 96GB-128GB there isn't really anything in the x86 landscape that can compete. But do you know how much such systems cost? $5000. So yes, for that kind of money you can beat an x86 system.

It depends on whether >64GB must be RAM or VRAM or alternatively Unified Memory.

If it can be RAM, using 128GB is easy and 192GB possible even for ordinary x64 desktops with suitable mainboard, CPU and RAM kits, which are ~€200 per 64GB so ~€600 for 192GB. With Threadripper (very expensive), much more RAM is possible.

If it must be VRAM, it becomes impractical with 4 to 8 water-cooled GPUs in a desktop in the €5.000 ~ €30.000 price range, which is similar to expensively configured Macs (MBPs are only at the lower end of such prices, but also below in speed.) Or, instead of just impractical, it becomes extremely expensive by using two or more Nvidia workstation or server GPUs, each for €10.000 ~ €100.000.

Where MBPs excel in €4.000 ~ €9.000 price range is to enable VRAM storage equivalent in the 64 ~ 192GB range (Or is 128GB the limit? I forgot the exact number.) in the notebook form factor. Such MBPs have two prominent use cases: a) medium quality LLMs; b) demanding video editing (because Apple has gimped bandwidth of all less expensively priced M3 MBPs compared to M2 MBPs, so one should prefer M2 to M3, see Tech Notice and Just Josh).

[lmao]

Welcome to learning that there are different AIs with different scopes

lmao what part of "everything has to be done with neural networks for something to be considered an ai" exactly evades your understanding. 'zero' game engines are ai, your crap isnt, get over it

There are many more uses of Go AIs than currently you imagine

HAHAHA yeah right

My major use differs: I use the AI to explore moves, variations and positions to help me studying theory of opening or middle game tactics and strategy very much faster than without using AI

HAHAHAHA what a nice way to describe online tournament cheating

Where MBPs excel in €4.000 ~ €9.000 price range is to enable VRAM storage equivalent in the 64 ~ 192GB range (Or is 128GB the limit? I forgot the exact number.) in the notebook form factor. Such MBPs have two prominent use cases: a) medium quality LLMs; b) demanding video editing (because Apple has gimped bandwidth of all less expensively priced M3 MBPs compared to M2 MBPs, so one should prefer M2 to M3, see Tech Notice and Just Josh).

lmao ranting again about something you dont know anything about, every sentence in your post is a pile of bullshit.
every m3 is better than corresponding m2 for ai, community did all tests already, read the fucking reddit instead of your intel shilling youtubers. its not only about ram bandwidth lol, it's a balance between gpu speed and ram bandwidth.
nbc really has to deplatform you low-effort low-quality commenters, you are a scarecrow for healthy community

Anything with an iGPU is UMA by definition.

lmao one more expert

[RobertJasiek]

"everything has to be done with neural networks for something to be considered an ai"

Your too restricted understanding of what can be AI.

'zero' game engines are ai

Wikipedia EN: "Artificial intelligence (AI) is the intelligence of machines or software, as opposed to the intelligence of other living beings, primarily of humans. It is a field of study in computer science that develops and studies intelligent machines. Such machines may be called AIs."

This definition acknowledges that the term AI is used for two major purposes: a property of machines / software; a field of study in computer science. We are discussing the former kind. That webpage does not define 'intelligence' though but only discusses various AI types. Remarkably, that webpage does write the following about one AI type:

"superhuman play and analysis in strategy games (such as chess and Go)"

There you have it. Even the weak Wikipedia EN webpage on AI has it.

My major use differs: I use the AI to explore moves, variations and positions to help me studying theory of opening or middle game tactics and strategy very much faster than without using AI

what a nice way to describe online tournament cheating

It would be, if it were a) online and b) during tournament game play.

However, I only use the AI a) offline and b) never during tournament game play.

crap
[...]
every sentence in your post is a pile of bullshit.
[...]
fucking
[...]
scarecrow

The Apple defender advertising for Apple by insulting others.

every m3 is better than corresponding m2 for ai,

1) Faster: probably.

2) Efficient: I am not sure about M2 versus M3 but reviewers have indicated M1 as more efficient.

3) In the context for bandwidth, I have written about video editing and have not written about AI. The Youtube tech reviewers Tech Notice and Just Josh have found that M2 MBP is better than M3 MBP for video editing, unless one buys the most expensive M3 MBP that is not crippled in bandwidth by Apple in an attempt to upsell for a few excess thousand euros.

it's a balance between gpu speed and ram bandwidth.

Sure. But without sufficient bandwidth, there is no balance.

nbc really has to deplatform you low-effort low-quality commenters

Whom do you think a social medium restricts first?

Somebody like you using insults, such as

crap
[...]
every sentence in your post is a pile of bullshit.
[...]
fucking
[...]
scarecrow

or somebody like me not using insults?

[lmao]

Your too restricted understanding of what can be AI.

you are simply arguing for the sake of arguing despite you lost this debate long ago

"superhuman play and analysis in strategy games (such as chess and Go)"
There you have it. Even the weak Wikipedia EN webpage on AI has it.

lmao exactly what i was talking about, they mean 'ZERO' series game engines that work using only neural network
and your crap isnt ai, its just a normal game engine with an added evaluation function using neural network, get over it and stop pretending you understand anything

1) Faster: probably.
2) Efficient: I am not sure about M2 versus M3 but reviewers have indicated M1 as more efficient.

pile of bullshit lmao, m3 have about the same power consumption for more compute power

The Youtube tech reviewers Tech Notice and Just Josh have found that M2 MBP is better than M3 MBP for video editing, unless one buys the most expensive M3 MBP that is not crippled in bandwidth by Apple in an attempt to upsell for a few excess thousand euros.

who cares about your cherry picked reviewers with failed results lmao
you are a hater and you only reference info that is your echo chamber, i am pretty sure you will be running around telling everyone s24u has better battery life than 15promax referring to some youtubers who claimed it, despite gsmarena already disproved the fact

or somebody like me not using insults?

lmao i dont care
insults are not a scarecrow for normal community, low-quality low-effort haters like you are
nbc will never create a healthy community until they deplatform you nikob neenyah and the likes, who just spread hate and misinformation lmao
like what are you doing in apple discussion you never even had a macbook lmao

[RobertJasiek]

Apple and you as one of its fans fear nothing more than free speech abouts its products. The fear is so great that you desire censorship and assign "hater" attributes to critics. History has taught that giving in to censorship and insults results in totalitarianism. Therefore, no number of calls for censorship or insults stops brave people.

As to ZERO series games, it is unclear what you mean. Zero-sum games? Deepmind game AI engines, such as AlphaGoZero, starting from only the game rules without prior human knowledge on tactics and strategy? Some other kind of games?

And yes, current Go AI engines use deep neural nets etc. (I have not said otherwise when speaking, more generally, about any AI.)

[lmao]

Apple and you as one of its fans

when i see yet another local low-effort commenter appealing to "you are a fan" rhetoric i immediately skip whole low-iq paragraph lmao its clear the guy lost the debate
ever heard me saying anything about "x86 fans"? get you s*** together and learn to admit you were wrong

As to ZERO series games, it is unclear what you mean. Zero-sum games? Deepmind game AI engines, such as AlphaGoZero, starting from only the game rules without prior human knowledge on tactics and strategy? Some other kind of games?

HAHAH question from "ai expert" posting on every ai-related article pretending he knows a thing or two
"what is a zero series of ai" wth how low can it go
i dunno man make your "educated guess", you are the "expert" right? lmao

And yes, current Go AI engines use deep neural nets etc.

for the third time - useing small neural net for a small part of the task doesn't make it ai lmao
ai has to use neural nets for everything aka "think" using exactly the same processes as human
or maybe you think human is going through 24359024850439358 board combinations one by one and building decision trees in their "RAM" lmao