Zenbook Pro 16X (2023) review: Maximum power from the Asus flagship at last

[Neenyah]

Another 💩fest from Niko 🥱 Ok, let's still mention one thing...

In fact, the degradation of education in Western countries over the past 25 years, at a minimum,...

See, you are a 100% perfect example of that - you quite literally cannot read. You are simply incapable to see and understand ( ⚠️ low IQ alert ⚠️) written words and as A's attempt above has, sadly, failed to open your eyes I will also try it, there direct quite from the review:

The DisplayP3 preset from Asus ensures a very low color deviation of only ΔΕ2000 1.58 in the same color space. This means that even a trained eye is unlikely to notice any color differences.

But nah, you clown will still keep going with trolling and spamming crusade because no one but you - a braindead sheep - is ever right about anything:

In the review, the author tried to calibrate this shameful screen (for professional work with color!) in hardware and got dE>6!
That's it, the product is not suitable for working with color. Under the bulldozer.

The author himself breeds insanity, arguing back in the end, putting the screen with the disadvantages clearly indicated in the text of the review as a plus of the model!

🤡

[NikoB]

Stupid Asus trolls don't understand that the author, with a "perfect" screen, for some reason did hardware calibration and got a terrible result, even worse than on a screen with 45% NTSC!

Stupid trolls don't know that color rendition fades over time, especially on a lousy AMOLED, and you still need to recalibrate. Not to mention that professionals always do it, never trusting the factory settings. And when they recalibrate, they will get a terrible result.

Almost $5000 down the drain, with which the unfortunate victims of Asus marketers and their A/Neenyah bots (who were completely burned) and congratulations to whoever buys this series.

[Neenyah]

Stupid Asus trolls don't understand that the author, with a "perfect" screen, for some reason did hardware calibration and got a terrible result, even worse than on a screen with 45% NTSC!

You don't ever give up, don't you? Keep acting like an even bigger clown, just don't read what it says in the article:

The different display modes on the Asus Zenbook Pro 16X ensure accurate color representation. In native mode, the display has an average color deviation of ΔΕ2000 3.36 (DisplayP3 target color space). The DisplayP3 preset from Asus ensures a very low color deviation of only ΔΕ2000 1.58 in the same color space. This means that even a trained eye is unlikely to notice any color differences.

Stupid trolls don't know that color rendition fades over time, especially on a lousy AMOLED, and you still need to recalibrate. Not to mention that professionals always do it, never trusting the factory settings. And when they recalibrate, they will get a terrible result.

Your own brain fades away much faster though, actually it's gone already so who do you blame there for that?

[NikoB]

I just slid under the table from laughter, from the nonsense that this troll Neenyah writes.

"Device for Adobe programs."

Hahaha

dE>6 (Terrible) - it's impossible to work with accurate color AFTER calibration! A filthy AMOLED panel with rapid burnout (with terrible calibration out of the box!) and holes in the screen at the pixel level.
Shameful native contrast (and this is on OLED!) at less than 5000:1(!) instead of the promised 1M:1+!
Brightness is less than 400 nits, despite the fact that fake support for HDR600 (and this NOT HDR10 support) is declared, which requires a minimum of 600 nits.
The glossy screen glares monstrously in any complex light environment behind the owner or to the side of the screen.

The processor is frankly weak for Adobe Premiere. 7945HX is almost 2 times faster with the same PL1!

The video card - 4080 is connected via the shameful x8, not x16, and instead of 16GT/s, in the screenshots it is only 2.5GT/s(sick)!

The RAM is soldered - if a client needs 64GB (and a professional will 100% need it) - he will have to replace the laptop for $4000?! WTF?!

Who stopped you from immediately installing the 7940HS + 64GB of soldered LPDDR5 7500 for such a price, as is installed here? At the same time, PL1 could be 30W smaller with the same performance.

The noise is clearly unpleasant at 38dBA under average load, which is typical when working with photo/video content.

Well, I'll already mention the non-classical keyboard...artists are a different breed.

What do we get as a result? A laptop that does NOT meet its stated goals in a key parameter - the screen.

The entire series goes straight into a trash or under a bulldozer.

[A]

Brightness is less than 400 nits, despite the fact that fake support for HDR600 (and this NOT HDR10 support) is declared, which requires a minimum of 600 nits.

'HDR600 True Black' certification requires 350 nits across the display and 600 nits in 10% patch, which this display (ATNA60BX01) is capable of, which is mentioned in reviews of other laptops with the same OLED panel.

HDR10 is not a certification, lol.

[NikoB]

Hello troll. The author of the review claims something that he has not actually verified. And yes, there is no HDR10 certificate (despite AMOLED) - which is shameful for a simple reason - shameful contrast and brightness. And also disgusting real color accuracy after hardware calibration.

The entire series can be immediately sent under the bulldozer.

[A]

there is no HDR10 certificate (despite AMOLED)

HDR10 is not a certificate, it's content type for TVs and video signal sources. You get HDR10 when you can send or receive specific stream data format. RTX2060 is HDR10+ lol.

Can you just stop disgracing yourself.

[NikoB]

Stupid Asus trolls are still stupidly trying to justify the terrible screen of this garbage craft from Asus. HDR10 (Static HDR metadata) places stringent demands on the screen. And this shame from Asus does not match them, despite the AMOLED screen.

[A]

I don't know if I can laugh at you or you have a real medical diagnosis and laughing at you is bad.

HDR10 (Static HDR metadata) places stringent demands on the screen.

No, lol. It's just a video stream data format.

[Neenyah]

I don't know if I can laugh at you or you have a real medical diagnosis and laughing at you is bad.

😅🖤

[NikoB]

You are both such stupid trolls that you don't even know that true HDR standards (which HDR10 implements in practice) only work on OLED screens. Asus, to its shame, has itself signed that their OLED screen is of poor quality; moreover, it is not intended for professional work with color, as the author of the review proved. Relax, little trolls, today is Saturday.

[Neenyah]

Asus, to its shame, has itself signed that their OLED screen is of poor quality; moreover, it is not intended for professional work with color, as the author of the review proved.

Seek professional help, seriously.

[A]

true HDR standards (which HDR10 implements in practice) only work on OLED screens

Another bs from a person who clearly never knew what DisplayHDR is and thinks HDR10 is an image quality certification.

[NikoB]

You both need medical attention. After all, both of you are either paid bots or idiots.

I hope adequate people understand who you both are, so you will have to change your nicknames. But I don't. So, in general, the goal has been achieved.

[A]

You both need medical attention. After all, both of you are either paid bots or idiots. I hope adequate people understand who you both are, so you will have to change your nicknames. But I don't. So, in general, the goal has been achieved.

Lol the "audience" you are trying to appeal to here exists only in your head, man. As you were told before,

Seek professional help, seriously.