Me all this childish squabble over the keyboard (it's obviously wretched against the background of full-fledged ones in the x86 camp, there's nothing to argue about, that's why Windows with x86 has been leading the market for 30 years, not Apple), an very slow by response time screen for the eyes in dynamics and incompatible with 4k/2.5/fhd video.
It's never full quiet, but it's not easy either. It is poorly compatible with the x86 codebase which is huge and overwhelming. It doesn't have any of the latest features, like per-button RGB button illumination.
I'm only interested in one thing - why was the memory controller praised by Apple marketers not tested in the review, which is 4 times wider (512 bits) than the x86 camp and allegedly 4-5 times faster in bandwidth? This is a key gap, because neither Intel, let alone AMD, can give people 96GB of memory that downloads data at a speed of more than 300GByte/s.
I don't see a gap in this regard in any test, although such memory should speed up Photoshop filters by at least 3 times relative to Raptor Lake. Where are the tests and benchmarks in Photoshop on cross-platform tests? Where are benchmarks for archivers, video encoders? It's all important, but I don't see it...