It's kind of a shame, Asus! The contrast is only 16000:1, not at least 100000:1 (or as they often promise on OLED 1000000:1) and at the same time 240Hz PWM. How did you manage to slap something like this - there is no real black color and at the same time the screen is harmful to the eyes! It would be better if it was 5000:1 (which is still cooler than even VA with glossy) and with DC Dimming without low-frequency PWM... Although it is unlikely that someone will sit at a 13.3" undersize for more than 15-20 minutes, rather connect an external monitor, but still ...
Again, it is modestly silent about the fact that the resource (brightness drop by 2 times) on AMOLED screens is at least 2 times worse than that of IPS (7-8k hours vs. 15k). I don't know how it all looks in the modern world of consumerism, but my laptops usually work for at least 12k hours (on the screen) and, accordingly, a laptop with AMOLED will quickly require its replacement, because. or the brightness will drop or there will be a strong color imbalance.
I am writing this to the fact that manufacturers, obviously not giving a damn about people's health, apparently intend to soon install these damned AMOLED panels in all laptops (and always with a vile gloss, not matte - all your glare). And soon it will become almost impossible to buy a laptop (and then apparently a monitor :=( ) with IPS/VA in practice, as now it is almost impossible to buy a smartphone with a good flicker-free IPS panel and the necessary set of characteristics (hello Xiaomi! And to hell with Samsung and Apple ), such, for example, as video recording at 4k@60fps+OIS.