Well, here is the first 4k model that is normal in response and just at 17.3. Wonderful! But! The contrast is shameful for such a top panel, the minimum should be 1500:1. And gentlemen reviewers from this site - it's time for you to introduce a formalized method for measuring viewing angles (measure the real four viewing angles when the contrast drops by 5 and 10 times). Well, once again I draw the attention of the public to the fact that Alder Lake outright loses to TigerLake-H in AIDA64 Ray Trace FP64 tests. Demonstration of how the new Intel architecture is slower in floating point operations in the old unoptimized code. Almost 2.5 times! This is no good!
In terms of tuning RAM, the manufacturer clearly made a mistake. The speed of pumping in memory is seriously below the norm.
Well, once again I want to emphasize that all manufacturers are essentially deceiving buyers with an HDMI 2.1 port - in reality, no one tests it for full compliance with the full capabilities of 2.1, i.e. 48Gbps and more. The standardization committee itself admitted that rogue chip makers can put a 2.1 label on anything, in fact, without even having full support for 48Gb / s. It's time, as with PL1 / PL2, to clearly indicate to the reviewers what the buyer will deal with in the case of an HDMI port,
The same goes for TB3 / TB4.0 / USB40 - you need to check whether there really is a working support for eGPU and other requirements.