One purchaser of this unit (at Costco.com) posted a review comment about successfully swapping out the 4GB RAM module for a 16GB, thus achieving 24GB total (and also swapping for a faster/bigger SSD, without voiding any warranty stickers/seals).
However, the review here said:
"GPU Performance
The integrated Iris Xe 96 EUs in our test unit returns disappointing results that are 30 percent slower than the average Iris Xe 96 EUs in our database. This performance deficit usually happens when RAM is slow and/or running in single-channel mode instead of dual-channel mode. The asymmetric RAM configuration of our unit (4 GB removable + 8 GB soldered) is the likely culprit of the relatively poor GPU performance..."
My question is: If A) substituting an 8GB module (thus matching the soldered-in 8GB) would presumably/hopefully permit the preferred higher-performing "dual-channel" mode, would B) substituting a larger 16GB module (i.e., the Costco customer's scenario) result in dual-channel mode AND the benefits of doubling memory from as-factory 12GB up to 24GB total, or C) only continued single-channel mode (due to the mismatched module sizes) and still some benefits of the increase to 24GB total?
And, even if (C) is the outcome (no dual-channel mode, yet 24GB total), would scenario (A) actually be more preferable for general daily performance (16GB total, a modest total increase of 4GB, but achieving dual-channel mode)?
I'm hoping it might result in a scenario (B): dual-channel mode AND 24GB total.
Advice?