Quote from: _MT_ on July 27, 2021, 07:35:30
Quote from: Patrick P. Gelsinger on July 27, 2021, 06:38:27
So 10 is now 7, and 7 is now 4, and Winston Churchill is a carrot. Bravo!
It looks like an alignment with TSMC's nomenclature. 10 nm Intel is counterpart to 7 nm TSMC. And 7 nm Intel was expected to slot somewhere between 3 and 5 nm TSMC.
I think most people familiar with processors and process tech knew that Intel's processes were superior - Intel's 22nm was better than TSMC and Samsung's 16nm, their 14nm was better than TSMC and Samsung's 10-8nm, and so forth.
I'd also say it's fair to call 10nm ESF comparable with TSMC 7nm, now they're done fixing it up. It wouldn't have been before though, which is why this has become a necessary step for them.
Similarly, 7nm is *predicted* to be between 5nm and 3nm, but the OG Intel 10nm was supposed to clobber TSMC on power and density 7nm until it didn't, and it continued not to until their 4th go around (10, 10+, 10SF, 10ESF) - so I will be very interested to see how their first go at 7nm / "4" looks. Fingers crossed they're back on track.