Samsung's latest Galaxy S21 Ultra commercials leave a lot to be desired with its camera comparisons against the iPhone 12 Pro Max

[Redaktion]

The Galaxy S21 Ultra has impressive cameras, not least thanks to its 108 MP primary sensor. So does the iPhone 12 Pro Max, but Samsung's latest commercials claim otherwise.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Samsung-s-latest-Galaxy-S21-Ultra-commercials-leave-a-lot-to-be-desired-with-its-camera-comparisons-against-the-iPhone-12-Pro-Max.541401.0.html

[Drizzle1978]

For individuals to rely simply on DxOmark is silly, especially considering their rather strange grading & scoring system.  Do your own research on the two to make a definitive choice between the two phones.

Not in defense of either Samsung or Apple, but most seem to know how shady DxOmark is, so a mention of them isn't a good thing in most people's book.

[Ericrm]

That's exactly what I was thinking. Anyone who has used both the S20 Ultra and the S21 Ultra would know that the S21 Ultra is a huge improvement. As soon as I heard that DxOMark rated it lower than last year's model, I decided that their reviews are completely worthless.

[Ronald E Lytle]

All I will say is S21 📷"s are The Best and that's facts there 📷 are amazing 👏🙌👌 #Samsung

[joseph]

 :(  :-\
Your own site makes comparisons between cameras, so why use a third party source that is known to be 'irregular' in its testing method? If you actually base any arguments on the ratings here, it would make for a significantly more informative article.
At least do an actual comparison between the photos shot on this website, not the opinion of another company

[LOL]

How about reading carefully the various DxOMark tests and reviews, see what methodology they use etc, instead of brushing off DxOMark entirely simply because it didn't give your beloved phone brand a high enough score, thus hurting your tender feelings?

[krash3x]

I wouldn't hold my breath for this site.  They are still using bench marks for the iPhone 11 for the iPhone 12.  I've told them months ago, but they still haven't fixed it. 

[S.Yu]

That's exactly what I was thinking. Anyone who has used both the S20 Ultra and the S21 Ultra would know that the S21 Ultra is a huge improvement. As soon as I heard that DxOMark rated it lower than last year's model, I decided that their reviews are completely worthless.

Welcome to the club, DxO's ratings for S6 and Nokia 808 years ago already proved that they're severely biased and entirely worthless.

[Thredgd]

Has no one pointing out the failings of this piece noticed that the articles author used to work for apple? It says as much in his bio at the bottom of the page. Also it's pretty odd to call a product commercial biased.. Cant say I've ever seen a company make an advert that promotes their competitors. Yet with a biased writer who'd expect any less. Still won't pick up either phone to be honest, the new Xiaomi is calling my name..

[Eze Patrick]

The writer of this article is highly bias, saying all sot of s*** against Samsung won't disprove the fact that Samsung G.S21 Ultra outclassed Iphone 12 pro Max. It is clear Mr writer is jittery of Samsung's latest improvement. Dxomark is biased too so people aren't interested in their s*** anymore, there are reliable sites with video reviews which are neutral in their comparison one can check on not "Apple addict Dxomark".