News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

MediaTek leapfrogs Qualcomm as the world's largest smartphone chipset vendor thanks to huge growth in India and Latin America

Started by Redaktion, December 24, 2020, 21:07:51

Previous topic - Next topic

Redaktion

MediaTek has overtaken Qualcomm to become the world's largest smartphone chipset vendor in terms of market share for the third quarter of 2020 (Q3 2020). MediaTek has been busy this year with its Dimensity series appearing in numerous budget and midrange smartphones. Qualcomm has remained strong in the 5G and high-end segments though.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/MediaTek-leapfrogs-Qualcomm-as-the-world-s-largest-smartphone-chipset-vendor-thanks-to-huge-growth-in-India-and-Latin-America.512177.0.html

Veyron

They can thank Trump for forcing Chinese OEMs to diversify away from American tech. It's only downhill from here for Qualcomm.

S.Yu

Quote from: Veyron on December 24, 2020, 21:39:13
They can thank Trump for forcing Chinese OEMs to diversify away from American tech. It's only downhill from here for Qualcomm.
lol, MTK has always been cheaper but they only recently caught up in performance.
American companies are also diversifying away from Chinese manufacturing.

Deng Frosch

In an attempt to match Qualcomm's performance, MediaTek overclocks their processors. This results in system instability, excess battery drain and shortens the life of MediaTek processors. Apple and Qualcomm remain far ahead of the others.

Krish Saxena

Mediatek has been done pretty amazing with its chipsets this year especially with the new 5G enabled Dimensity chips

S.Yu

Quote from: Deng Frosch on December 26, 2020, 13:25:41
In an attempt to match Qualcomm's performance, MediaTek overclocks their processors. This results in system instability, excess battery drain and shortens the life of MediaTek processors. Apple and Qualcomm remain far ahead of the others.
Um no. They both use stock cores on stable, publically available processes. There's not gonna be a big difference in CPU speed at least that needs some sort of unstable workaround.

Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview