Look, I can keep bashing you all day, every day, but the fact is that you have to recheck how you calculate your scores.
Intel model: 2 times slower in multithreading performance and it gets 87% when the AMD model gets only 86%? Really?
This is no more hilarious. It's closer to Userbenchmarks and it is pity. Every time you post an article about how AMD beats Intel, it looks more like a try to cover up how distorted the final scores are.
Intel model. 50% more expensive, 2 times slower. 81%
AMD: The obvious choice. 83%. Only 2% difference for a 50% higher price and pathetic performance?
You have to recheck your scoring system. While everything can be important in a laptop, because you can't change it/upgrade it like in a desktop, your scoring system could give an 80%+ score in a laptop with a dual core Atom processor and a $2000 price because everything else in that laptop, screen, keyboard, battery life, etc is perfect.