First benchmarks of the 10th gen Comet Lake-H series demonstrate Intel's continued dominance in single-core, but AMD Ryzen 4000 has largely closed the gap

[A]

@A remain however a good comparison because frequency of ram is lower than Ryzen. 14nm beats 7nm of amd.

i admit intel hw enginners are better than amd.

You are aware that intel only supports up to 2933mhz ram right? How is it AMD's fault Intel engineers couldn't figure out how to support faster ram?

The reality is, due to design AMD's processor benefit from faster ram much more than Intel processors.

And again, AMD has lower power usage and much faster iGPU.

[8&8]

@A/Wblake are u serious? have u seen benchmarks? intel beats amd/TSMC node again with 100% of more space and lower frequency ram. AMD hw engineer aren't excellent! This is fact. I'm not a stupid fanboy,] i'm pro amd or intel [, we have to admit that again in their superefreshed 14nm fried/fish are still competitive with 7nm. maybe not with / EUV but my congratulations. When will we see 7nm of intel against 7+AMD we can speak about their performances. ALU's intel far better than amd.

iGPU always better than intel from 2012. not a surprise.

[8&8]

@blake

why were gone to the rest skylake arch enginners?
they invest minds and money into AI in processors that you will see with a letter "N" that stays for Nirvana. If you search in this site u'll find some articles with processors of 2c/4t and they are good. Not a revolution but a decent evolution (leopard2A4 MBT) good first step.

NG = Nirvana&iGraphic


Sylicon Sylicon Sylicon.

[A]

@A/Wblake are u serious? have u seen benchmarks? intel beats amd/TSMC node again with 100% of more space and lower frequency ram. AMD hw engineer aren't excellent! This is fact. I'm not a stupid fanboy,] i'm pro amd or intel [, we have to admit that again in their superefreshed 14nm fried/fish are still competitive with 7nm. maybe not with / EUV but my congratulations. When will we see 7nm of intel against 7+AMD we can speak about their performances. ALU's intel far better than amd.

iGPU always better than intel from 2012. not a surprise.

But again, it's a difference of design. Intel's processors don't benefit as much from higher clocked ram as AMD does. But arguing that is futile because the benchmarks speak for themselves, and AMD processors win in multicore benchmarks by a HUGE margin despite same amount of cores.

We all know that TSMC's 7nm is closer to Intel's 10nm. But we won't get to compare Intel's 7nm because by that point AMD will be on 5nm node.

iGPUs take space and power, so you can't pretend they don't play a role. And nowadays iGPUs performance is a lot better than before, enough to compete with low end dGPUs even.

[whiskeylakkee]

Yeah your right, their engineers back during skylake were amazing. Then they wanted to cut their budget and laid off tons of their veteran engineers, and look at them now. Saved a couple dollars but lost all of their greatest talent.

[william blake]

nm notation is not actually comparable. Intel 10nm not equals TSMC 10nm!
The 2 companies budget is not comparable, still AMD improves like crazy from uarch to uarch

tsmc 7=intel 10. wiki says so

[8&8]

someone knows why always x Lake? lake lake lake?

Intel is so wet? ok that they are having water from all sides, but change name!

[Joe Blowe]

LOL

AMD clobbers Intel clock for clock, core for core.

8C vs 8C, never thought I'd see such a deficit from Intel.

And yet, there will be very few laptops with AMD chip inside this year.

[maffle]

Is this a April Fools joke article? "demonstrate Intel's leads" ... !? You call 3% a "demonstrated lead" with what, 50% more energy consumption? And then AMD be like 20% ahead in multicore again with -30% energy consumption?