Red Dead Redemption 2 gets a 90s look with ultra-low graphics settings

[Redaktion]

Rockstar Games released Red Dead Redemption 2 a few weeks ago on PC with some hefty recommended system requirements. While you will always need around 150 GB of storage free to install Red Dead Redemption 2, a new video shows the unintended consequences of forcing the game to run at the lowest possible graphics settings. At least you can now run Red Dead Redemption on integrated graphics, though.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Red-Dead-Redemption-2-gets-a-90s-look-with-ultra-low-graphics-settings.444017.0.html

[Meandererer]

Clickbait YouTube channels != news.

P. S.: this isn't even like "the 90's look". This is what "Indie, 8-bit" is to 8-bit. Play some Thief, if you can find time between checking your smartphone for new videos that've been "Recommended by YouTube".
P. P. S.: Zoomer.

[Alex Alderson]

Clickbait YouTube channels != news.

P. S.: this isn't even like "the 90's look". This is what "Indie, 8-bit" is to 8-bit. Play some Thief, if you can find time between checking your smartphone for new videos that've been "Recommended by YouTube".
P. P. S.: Zoomer.

Well, I hope that your diatribe gave you a sense of superiority.

Next time, read through an entire article before jumping to the comments. If you had, you might have seen that I had elaborated on the description to which you took offence. Last time I checked, a game that came out in 1998 does not qualify as being pre-PS1.

Using a term like Zoomer shows your age and highlights your immaturity too, buddy.

[Meandeerrawr]

I'm not your "buddy", guy. Pick someone your age. That's a one.
Next up, if you unironically think that anyone, ANY-ONE reads your "articles", end-to-end, then you're the one with the "sense of superiority" here. Come on, pick any book on professional journalism, if that sounded like a revelation to you.
Now, I want you to understand that this is a serious website, chock full of highly informative content (not in the news section, ofc); your bringing your Zoomer habits, and your content consumption culture, HERE, is certainly not appreciated.
Oh, and have fun on YouTube today. We, Notebookcheck readers, are EXCITED to see what AMAZING new finds you're going to share with us next. Thank you, Alex, what a guy.

[Alex Alderson]

I'm not your "buddy", guy. Pick someone your age. That's a one.
Next up, if you unironically think that anyone, ANY-ONE reads your "articles", end-to-end, then you're the one with the "sense of superiority" here. Come on, pick any book on professional journalism, if that sounded like a revelation to you.
Now, I want you to understand that this is a serious website, chock full of highly informative content (not in the news section, ofc); your bringing your Zoomer habits, and your content consumption culture, HERE, is certainly not appreciated.
Oh, and have fun on YouTube today. We, Notebookcheck readers, are EXCITED to see what AMAZING new finds you're going to share with us next. Thank you, Alex, what a guy.

Wow, I did not think that you would bite down so hard on that tiny piece of bait. Bless.

Still, you gave me another good laugh. Thanks for that.

Just a suggestion, but maybe 4chan would be more your thing. Your insistence on using the term "zoomer" in all its finery implies as much.