Hey guys,
Thanks for the feedback as always! Glad you enjoyed this review :-)
@techno7:
I don't have both machines together here, but at least from the documents and evidence I've seen I would not expect any differences between the two whatsoever. It appears the case design is identical between the two models and that only the internal components have changed.
@Table fan:
Glad you enjoy our affinity for exhaustive graphs and tables. Thank you for reading! ;-)
Andreas Osthoff on the other side of the globe is handling the X1 Extreme reviews (including the new FHD SKU), and all we've published thus far about his new config is available here:
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Lenovo-ThinkPad-X1-Extreme-4K-vs-FHD.338800.0.html
However the review should be posted very soon. I don't imagine we'll see much of a difference thermally as, like you said, the size of the case specifically is the primary constraint here. However sometimes the lower-powered CPUs perform nearly as admirably in sustained testing as their more expensive counterparts thanks to the thermal limitations, so it could be illuminating as to the sort of value the user is getting by paying up for the pricier components.
@LAAN:
I'm not sure the difference we've measured between the two is really that significant (30.8ms vs. 32ms; 55.6ms vs. 61.6ms -- that's 1.2ms and 6ms difference, or differences of 5% and 10% roughly). It's something, but it may have to do with how the measurements are recorded. I would need to check with the lab as I don't personally perform the display measurements before analyzing and publishing the review itself.
In short, though, both screens are quite slow in terms of response times. Whether the real values are 61.6, 55.6, or (most likely) someplace in between (say, 58 ms), it's quite simply sluggish at any rate.
Hope this helps answer your questions! Thanks for reading.
-Steve