I am not sure whether I overreacted. It appears to be quite rare that internet commentators or analysts are accurate, forthcoming or evenhanded when discussing the financial performance of corporations such as AMD. So you can't really expect too much. I just didn't think Notebookcheck would publish articles on such loaded topic without at least addressing the long term. Which I find to be in sharp contrast to their in depth reviews, without a doubt the best laptop reviews available. I admit though that the use of "apparently" could just as well be suggestive rather than a statement of facts. However, I still think it is important to reserve judgment or speculation on the causality of actions when there is no real data to support any claim one way or another.
On a personal note, I think AMD is a very interesting company, and I am probably a fan. I was very interested in computers well into the Athlon XP era, but it was only three years ago that I got into computers again and by that time AMD was very mediocre. These Bulldozer years have been very boring. Still though, I think their cat core products show promise. My Lenovo E145 which I purchased based on a review on this site has been a stellar companion for a year now (with the obligatory SSD-upgrade). I think more than ever that they are on track to produce the right low power parts that can do well against Intel and perhaps renew the competition. Though I respect the fact that Intel has a significant process advantage, even if 14 nm is close.