All these declarations are dummy until people really check real laptops. And let me remind you -- Lunar Lake has - 32GB RAM, Zen4 Phoenix/Zen5 has 256GB in 2 slots ...
Already on the slides it is clearly visible that the new one does not claim to be increased performance, because It is strongly clamped by TDP (which I generally approve and wrote about it many times), but Intel itself stepped on eggs (sorry, rake), engaged in impudent cheater by consumption starting from the 12th series, in order to somehow shine in a multi-thread performance vs. Zen2/3/4. Naturally with 1.5-2 times the worst performance of 1W.
Now Intel is forced to throw off consumption (including because the new chips simply cannot disperse normally with an increase in consumption as the old Alder/Raptor Lake) at times and the result of the face - we are now perhaps in Zen5 Strix Halo for game platforms and HEDT will see more than 5000 points in the Cinebench R15 in a multi-thread test.
This whole series, even "Core Ultra 9" (Base TDP only 30W), is essentially budget chips for office laptops, but not for game laptops and workstations (HEDT). But what is Intel to offer for HEDT? Something that is exactly faster than the king of laptop processors- 7945HX, but with the new technical process? It looks like nothing..
I am bored - we are waiting for Zen5 Strix Halo with a 256-bit memory controller and look at its real performance. And Lunar Lake will leave hipsters in cafes and housewives.