AMD is the same antitrust pad for Intel as Mozilla (which is kept from disappearing by the money of the main sponsor and at the same time "competitor") is for Google. Do not even hope for an increase in the supply of consumer SoCs from AMD, because in reality, AMD supplies are falling year by year, as well as Intel's market share is growing back, despite the fact that they allegedly have less technologically advanced products on a more outdated technical process.
Moreover, greedy laptop manufacturers themselves deliberately sabotage new features in models with AMD. Probably due to conspiracy/pressure from Intel.
Even where it is clearly possible to provide better port options, they intentionally make the port selection worse than the Intel versions. This is a clear sabotage of AMD products.
And AMD itself is apparently not at all interested in the laptop market, focusing on the server and console market. Because they themselves admitted that they deliberately hold back the supply of new SoC series, for the sake of selling off the old one. With this overall approach (including the worst port options on AMD laptops), it's not surprising that their market share in laptops has started to fall again year on year.
------
We live in an era of market monopolies and oligopolies, as well as imperialism, when large companies owning an overwhelming global share are used for geopolitical interests, while the authorities of such countries deliberately turn a blind eye to anti-market methods and business conditions. Thus, the antimonopoly authorities are ordered to essentially keep quiet.
At the same time, developing countries with a more backward society a priori cannot imagine any alternative, because they simply do not have sufficient human capital of this level and never will if society does not develop in a civil manner. The collapse of the USSR empire (on the ruins of which another dangerous monster grew up, as it grew after the defeat of Germany in World War I on the growth of violent populism (search for simple ways understandable to poorly educated segments of the population) and populist politicians, which resulted in World War II) proved this on practice, 31 years ago. China will eventually follow suit, although it will take some time. In addition, the West itself is now mired in leftist populism, destroying itself from within. Well, the question is that everything is going to a global war. Because the anger of sections of the population that find themselves on the sidelines of life is easiest to channel to external enemies, declaring all those who disagree with this as enemies of society and "foreign agents". Everything repeats itself in history, only technology and fast communications speed up everything many times over than it was before.
It won't get any better in the next 30-50 years, you can be sure of that. It will only get worse and worse in terms of the progress of civilization in scientific and technical terms and socially. Conflicts and a general drop in the level of education of the world's population, especially in developed countries, are the reason for this. As well as growing aggression due to increasing population and competition for the resources of the planet. The next dark age of mankind has come due to the aggravation of contradictions, the quiet time has ended for a fruitful well-coordinated global creativity. Whether humanity will be able to go through this new dark era of the neo-medieval age and not perish this time, the question is open...
Soon the population of even developed countries will think not about how to buy the latest fashionable gadget and have advanced fun from boredom, but about how to simply survive in the rapidly changing conditions of accelerating stagflation and conflicts from all sides.