Again, fake data on the speed of DDR5 4800 from AIDA64. The 4800 can NOT have 86Gbyte/s, because theoretical limit 76Gbytes/s. For reading and copying, the speed, on the contrary, is low, the copying speed is especially shameful, i.e. key indicator.
Going further, the author gave a crazy 90% score, although this laptop is NOT able to provide sufficient performance in native and crisp 2.5k for games, and fhd mode is extremely bad on such panels, because it turns out muddy. Need a 4k@120-144hz panel with crisp 4k/fhd(max fps) modes.
"240Hz" is fake again. If you sum and divide of B2W/G2G responses on average, it turns out to be slightly better than real 100Hz. This is enough for games and work, but the lies of the laptop manufacturer are obvious.
The author claims even more "vivid" colors in games. But people don't want "vivid" colors, they want accurate colors as the developers intended.
From the point of view of work, i.e. universal laptop for home/office - the laptop does not have at least 95% AdobeRGB for professional work with color, and at the same time, as always, the fools from Acer make again a bad numpad block (right arrow key on place insert key), which immediately destroys fast blind typing in 2 hands using the numpad as a navigation block, for quick group operations with files and copy- paste in 2 hands. Quick operations in the same Excel are impossible with such a corrupted numpad. And again bad, narrow by height, Esc,F1..F2 block for work.
The price of the device is simply monstrous compared to the mediocre performance of both the processor and the video card for 2023. Either the dollar has already depreciated by 50% in 7-8 months, or someone is very greedy.
The real price of such a laptop is no more than $ 1300-1400, taking into account inflation and real performance compared to the previous generation in 2022, including competitors. Everything else is a gift to sellers-speculators and the manufacturer literally for nothing.
If there were 64GB DDR5 4800 (which already cost less than $120) and 4TB SSD ($190-250 with FIVE years warranty, not 1-2 inside laptops!), this price could somehow be justified, but the shameful and ridiculous 16GB of which has not been enough for anything for a long time and a ridiculous rogue SSD only 1TB, cause only contempt for the manufacturer and the price assigned here...
The manufacturer could also give an extended full on-site warranty of 3-5 years, then this would also justify at least somehow a clearly overpriced price by $500-600.
The final score, taking into account the shortcomings, cannot be higher than 85%.
Considering battery autonomy (and dramatically worse performance), as well as the monstrous weight of the PSU, talking about such devices as a portable laptop is ridiculous.
This is a purely office, home option that will run forever from the PSU more than 95% of the time. The question is - why do you need a funny and obsolte 16"/2.5k at home/office, when it's better to buy 18" with 4k@120-144Hz, right? But where are they in abundance? They still alomost don't exist on global market, but they sell all this junk with an incomprehensible target audience...
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar