Quote from: Redaktion on June 05, 2023, 17:02:44After Ford and Tesla announced a collaborative effort to bring the Tesla's NACS charging hardware to Ford's future electric vehicles, a handful of EV charging providers have made their stances clear. Not everyone is on-board with the NACS port as a universal solution, though. Detractors of Ford's adoption of Tesla's charging standard point to concerns of safety and an industry moving away from truly open standards.
CCS is a terrible non-standard that should have never existed. Often times called the "Frankenstein plug", like sticking a parallel port onto a USB port into 1. They should have used the opportunity to create a standard from scratch and offer adapters for the old J1772 and Mennekes plugs. Instead, they stuck the level 2 plugs on top of the level 3 ones and called it a day. Thus you already have fragmentation with CCS-1 and CCS-2.
In the first place, the reason why NCAS exists was because SAE completely ignored Tesla in making CCS despite Tesla being the only one at the time who had EVs capable of Level 3 charging. This is also why CCS has such high failure rates when you ignore the one who has the most experience in the field in favor of automakers who at the time haven't even made a single EV
I remember a few years back reading an article of a woman car executive saying EVs will never take off with women due to the experience not being well thought out like plugs being too big for women's hands. But then comes the question, where was she when the standards were made? Yeah, right, they didn't care. CCS is a rushed standard made by people who didn't care together with the extra burden of backwards compatibility with even a more terrible old standard that existed before EVs all jumbled together to create a Frankenstein
I am not saying all EVs should go NCAS, but if I had to choose NCAS or CCS, I'd go with NCAS any day of the week