Thank you for the review.
It would be GREAT if NBC could test a few other devices this way - at least w.r.t. blood pressure, but especially blood glucose levels on devices that brag about it - like popular (and allegedly good) Polar or cheap Media-Tech watches, or, starting from whichever Galaxy Watch and/or iWatch you have.
From the systematic point of view, I think at least 10 measurements (with some idle time between them) for every parameter - or, say, like 5+ (maybe at least 2-3 for invasive tests like blood glucose, it could follow ordinary times the patient does it) for both healthy and unhealthy range - would be much more proper and trustworthy. I'm not sure what to think when I see just 2 measurements of blood glucose level, especially when "Dexcom" and "Measurement strips" reference measurements differ by more than norm required deviation. While this is probably fine - one result too high, one too low, both within allowed deviation - we can't see it because there is no even basic statistic to back it up or to say one of the measurements was an obvious outlier.