AMOLED always flickers (or does not have an "endless contrast") at a low frequency. It has a burnout resource 2 times worse than that of IPS, on average, it is poorly calibrated, often worse than 2 for dE, and often has incomplete resolution in color, unlike the full on IPS.
In the pluses, only response time (very low), very good viewing angles and a very low level of black, but only along with low-frequency PWM.
For constant work with text, surfing, the contrast version of Amoled is simply dangerous. Well, it will burn out much faster, with long work. The destiny of Amoled is a video, but not static pictures like office text/surfing.
Your comparison with your eyes is useless, without accurate digital data on the calibrator, measurement of the PWM frequency and other parameters like response. Only objective real numbers show the quality of the screen. Everyone's eyes are different (as well as color perception). The nervous system is different.
It's like comparing headphones according to reviews - what one person likes means absolutely nothing to another - everyone's ear frequency response is different. Headphones in general should always be made at the factory on an individual order after measuring the frequency response of the ears of a particular person and nothing else. It is easier with screens, but still the difference in perception is huge between people, for example, with a fast and slow nervous system (with different levels of color perception and eye sensitivity to brightness levels) in terms of the degree of influence on the nervous system and screens with low-frequency PWM.