Exynos 2200: Samsung continues to withhold performance metrics of its new flagship chipset

[Redaktion]

The Exynos 2200 made its debut nigh-on two weeks ago. Samsung has failed to provide any performance data on the chipset, however, instead choosing to focus on vague features and properties. While it's hardly earth-shattering, most would consider that a red flag.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Exynos-2200-Samsung-continues-to-withhold-performance-metrics-of-its-new-flagship-chipset.596510.0.html

[wolfchigo]

I think he's very good for this reason he brags and he doesn't want any leaks he wants to give us a surprise.

[Hardware Geek]

I do hope thry can deliver on the hype but I have a bad feeling this chipset is going to be a disaster 

[Billy]

Samsung failed to provide performance data

On a device that is not even released?

In other news Notebookchat have failed to review thousands of future items that are not yet released.

[ikjadoon]

Samsung failed to provide performance data

On a device that is not even released?

In other news Notebookchat have failed to review thousands of future items that are not yet released.

Tell me you've never read a product launch without telling me you've never read a product launch.

Everyone publishes performance claims during launch (except Intel during the 14nm scandal).

Apple, Arm Ltd., AMD, Intel now, Qualcomm, NVIDIA, and Samsung last year. 😂😂😂

[toven]

Still don't get this RT core over maximum raw graphics performance idea.

[Xavier]

Still don't get this RT core over maximum raw graphics performance idea.

Amd isn't doing it like Nvidia, the ray accelerator are on the same "core" as where conventional graphics are performed. To remove rt from the gpu, you would need a new architecture.
They could have used cdna2 or gcn I guess but maybe those where less efficient for gaming as well