It's so straightforward when you stop to think about the smartphone market for a second.
Why would I, a consumer, spend €1300 on a smartphone that has a hole in the screen, doesn't have a 3.5mm audio jack, doesn't have expandable storage and potentially will receive harmful updates like the Tab S7's green screen and other issues, when I can spend €500 on a smartphone that isn't punctured, has audio out, has expandable storage and will be exactly as mediocre as it is in terms of performance, in exchange for said performance being mediocre?
Sure there's a flippyphone, there's a folding phone, but they still lack features common to the cheap phones, and no a software feature that hides the puncture by disabling the whole space of the screen around it and an adapter that's only going to make the type-C port more filthy than it already gets in regular use are just stop-gap solutions to problems that didn't exist until Samsung's executives decided to create them, for penny-pinching or other reasons.
It's the reverse world where the cheaper phone is the more cheerful of the two.