News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Final nail in the coffin: Bar-raising AMD Ryzen 9 5950X somehow lags behind four Intel parts including the Core i9-10900K in average bench on UserBenchmark despite higher 1-core and 4-core scores

Started by Redaktion, November 10, 2020, 18:22:14

Previous topic - Next topic

Bomi

Quote from: VEGGIM on November 10, 2020, 20:03:44
Quote from: Rinnn on November 10, 2020, 18:46:32
UserBenchmark is a joke of a site for quite awhile and is usually heavily criticized both by fans and tech Youtubers for its Intel bias. I have seen core i3 cpus scoring higher than Ryzen 7 on that site as well. Wouldn't be surprised if Intel actually owns Userbenchmark.
I doubt that would be the case. It's banned from the r/intel subreddit as well. I dont think something that heavily promotes intel, would be banned from the r/intel subreddit. it doesn't make sense.

They don't need it on there. It adds credibility to Intel that they are banned, and makes people think like you just did.

Userbenchmark has high Google results, and caters to people that don't know anything about computers. So it doesn't matter if it's on cpu reddits, the people there wouldnt fall for their obvious BS anyway. Userbenchmark just needs to mislead more "gullible" people.

Benjamin stroud

Sounds like to me that the user benchmark people are in cahoots with Intel or that the person who wrote this article is an Intel fanboy who's trying to bash AMD and can't just accept the fact that AMD is kicking Intel's a** just the same as the president can't admit that he lost to Joe Biden

jackryan82812

All these hate comments show is that people don't know how to fucking read and will spew hate towards anything lmao

Do you have nothing better to do?

Vlasec

UserBenchmark captured my interest some time ago. But their fight against Ryzen is more and more apparent. At first, they started reducing the impact of core count on the result, and back then the weighting algorithm was still public. Then they reduced it further, later they made it private. They are more and more obscure, and not trustworthy at all, anymore.

Furthermore, feel free to read their "reviews" of the CPUs. In case of Ryzen 5 5600X, I haven't read a worse pile of bullcrap for quite some time, when I consider things that are published as "reviews". They're even recommending i5-9600K as a substitute for the far better Ryzen SKU.



Ryan Waldron

The difference being that Intel will be charging 4 times the price for a few percent performance gain. Amazing the kind of money people will spend to satisfy their own ego.

tauzN

Quote from: Ryan Waldron on November 12, 2020, 14:55:27
The difference being that Intel will be charging 4 times the price for a few percent performance gain. Amazing the kind of money people will spend to satisfy their own ego.

Who charges 4 times the price for the Intel? Are you high?

sirsquishy

So, if AMD can fix a scheduling issue facing windows then AMD will gain 2%-4% above Intel here. As it is most of the samples on these benchmark sites are not properly showing 5950x's that are running at 5.12ghz and 4.97ghz.

Pitirium

Does anyone know about any alternatives to this site?
And how do you compare hardware today?(besides from youtube reviews)
thanks


Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview