I meaaaaan, if I wasn't such a fanboy of the new Ryzen 4000's, I would honestly opt for the GS66 stealth, it's just better in everything but processor. Battery life, slimmer, thermals, screen, RGB, and a 2070 ( I hope not Max-Q ), the ram speed is most likely lower (2666MHz) just to point out that Intel isn't as heavy reliant on RAM. Oh and Thunderbolt support to sincerely future proof it. Now granted it's a whopping 2000 USD, but for those extra bucks I'd be really making a bang for it. It's just sad to see that MSI chose yet again to disappoint by not choosing the ryzen 4000s in this thing. On another side of the coin, Holy s*** the ryzen chips are monsters and save up soooooo much on battery, so the battery argument should not have been made earlier (granted). All I'm saying is, f*** you Asus for opting to give a s*** screen because this would've been the ultimate laptop with the 2060 variant for the simple gamer/college student, on a side note, do any of you know if we'd be able to hypothetically purchase let's just say an MSI screen from a vendor, and (again hypothetically) it fits into the frame and has all the knobs and whistles, would I be able to switch screens from the shitty default to a proper 144 or 120 or even 240 Hz screen with proper colour gamut and sRGB details ? Thanks a bunch