This is of course highly impressive - but CATL, NIO and other Chinese EV/battery market-leaders do seem to have very contradictory, bifurcating and very schizophrenic strategies and attitudes in terms of long battery life versus battery swapping.
How can they still rationalize and marry these two very contradictory discordant approaches ? The key issue or moot question never asked or answered by anyone being:
- the whole meaning and checkability of battery-life and a battery-pack's clocked-up mileage, age, capacity lost since new etc - all of these key state-of-health, resale-value and depreciation indicators evaporate into thin air - are unknowable, unverifiable and un-trackable as soon as an EV-owner begins to use battery-swapping stations !
But on the other hand one-off end-of-life, new-for-old battery-swapping stations ARE obviously exactly what consumers and EV critics DO want and ARE crying out for worldwide !
Paul G