Intel claims Lunar Lake's Arc 140V iGPU outperforms Radeon 890M by 16%

[Redaktion]

Intel has fully unveiled the new Lunar Lake series, and per the details shared by the company, the mobile chips bring a lot of upgrades over Meteor Lake. In terms of iGPU, the company says that the Arc 140V of Core Ultra 9 288V is the fastest in the market, with a 16% lead over the Radeon 890M of Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-claims-Lunar-Lake-s-Arc-140V-iGPU-outperforms-Radeon-890M-by-16.883629.0.html

[heffeque]

So... How long does it last before it starts burning from the inside?

[Enma45]

The MSI Claw first edition was the most disastrous launch with an Intel chip and once again the same story repeats itself, we will see how much it really consumes and how much it heats up, but one thing is clear in consoles for gamers it is AMD that has not yet launched all its processors and people are crazy to see them.

[O'Connell]

to be blunt, intel use lpddr5x @8533MHz with 256 bit bus, R9 370HX sodimm @5600MHz 128 bit.

for this reason is +19% faster.

[Jigdibigidig]

to be blunt, intel use lpddr5x @8533MHz with 256 bit bus, R9 370HX sodimm @5600MHz 128 bit.

for this reason is +19% faster.

According to an article on Computerbase, it was compared with the Asus AMD Zenbook 16 HX370 LPDDR5X-7500 MT/s.

[O'Connell]

According to an article on Computerbase, it was compared with the Asus AMD Zenbook 16 HX370 LPDDR5X-7500 MT/s.

ah didn't know that, my second mistake, for this reason is +16% faster. hope to see youtubers how will be good. (i'm not fan of amd or intel eh, just be objective)

[@man_daddio]

Well it looks like that 16% number was from benchmarks using xess performance and FSR performance configuration.
If Intel still beat AMD when FSR was enabled with their chip and xess was used with the Intel chip I'm impressed.
That shows that xess has a much greater increase in performance from last gen.
But we'll have to see the picture quality.
I think hardware based upscaling is better than FSR in any case.
I'm curious about the ray trace performance as well.
I personally don't think that Intel fudged the numbers. They have been pushing improvements across the board since Ryzen 5000 series released.
 It's unfortunate that they had the 13th and 14th gen debacle. In which, unfortunately, my CPU was affected. I had to return mine and get a new one.
I think the main thing about the Intel chips is the power draw. Even though I don't really care about that, a lot of people do.