News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Leaked Nintendo Switch 2 documents reinforce performance leap as power and cooling requirements skyrocket

Started by Redaktion, August 10, 2024, 02:49:36

Previous topic - Next topic

Redaktion

A recent Nintendo Switch 2 leak claimed Steam Deck-like performance from the upcoming handheld gaming console, and now, a new shipping manifest seems to reinforce that information. The supposed leaked documentation indicates that the Steam Deck 2 will be need to draw nearly twice as much power from the wall as the original Switch.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Leaked-Nintendo-Switch-2-documents-reinforce-performance-leap-as-power-and-cooling-requirements-skyrocket.873891.0.html

Nobody69

These two things completely contradict each other.

One of them is the Idiotic MLID made up nonsense video where he claims the switch 2 will pull less than 5 watts power draw when docked, and the other is a real public customs manifest a non hack tech reporter could easily go and verify as being real, that shows the switch 2's 60 watt psu shipping.

Steamdeck has a 45 watt psu by the way.

Jay Mann

Headline says it's about switch 2, blurb says " Steam Deck 2 will be need to draw nearly twice as much power from the wall as the original Switch." First paragraph mentions the "shipping manifest for the Steam Deck 2". Rest of the article mentions Switch 2. About which device is this article? And why does the text feel so awkward and has so many mistakes?

julian.vdm

Quote from: Jay Mann on August 10, 2024, 08:29:56Headline says it's about switch 2, blurb says " Steam Deck 2 will be need to draw nearly twice as much power from the wall as the original Switch." First paragraph mentions the "shipping manifest for the Steam Deck 2". Rest of the article mentions Switch 2. About which device is this article? And why does the text feel so awkward and has so many mistakes?

Thanks for pointing out those errors. I've corrected them in the piece.


Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview