All these funny games in antimonopoly matters are a smokescreen for the powerful stratum of the United States. They will never split up and really punish their large multinationals if they do everything in the geopolitical interests of the United States, but contrary to antitrust laws.
All animals are equal, but these are more equal...
In its early days, Google was a fairly customer-oriented company. Now you won't even be able to restore your account if you have all the correspondence for 20 years (previously this was easy through a robot, although there was live support). Now they have only one answer - "create a new account." They have no basic responsibility, even if someone has owned the account for decades.
We need to start with the fact that any large public service cannot unilaterally terminate and block an account without a court decision. And the recovery system should oblige you to provide recovery options even in the absence of double authorization (which is extremely dangerous from the point of view of access to your data at the level of the special services of your country - who simply gain access by substituting a SIM card for literally 30 seconds, just like the criminals who bribed cell phone employees salons).
Microsoft was the last company that did not have double authorization with forced linking of accounts to a SIM card if the client did not want it. But now M$ is completely rotten.
This is precisely a forced digital concentration camp, when you have no sane ways left without double authorization, except to maintain your own mail server on the router, which costs an additional subscription fee for an IP4 address, although IP6 allows you to assign thousands of permanent addresses without a fee.
But everyone will continue to use Windows as long as there is backward compatibility with x86 code and continuity in interface management. As soon as this is violated, interest in Windows immediately disappears. But in the absence of a sane alternative, new chaos will simply begin in the market, until someone stands out again and captures the main market share.
It is absolutely obvious (this does not require proof every time) that all large companies, without exception, conduct business using openly criminal methods, and their management and key beneficiaries should be in prison. But the system of law and "justice" is structured in favor of the rich in all countries, and not civil activists trying to prove their criminal acts. Otherwise, TNCs simply would not be able to exist on the planet. They would be destroyed by the claims of civil activists already at the stage of their consolidation for criminal methods.