Wild.
However, this reads too much like a crime article on a standard news site than one that fits on Notebookcheck. The financial specifics of the use of the profits don't reveal anything technologically enlightening, and posting the name and background of an indivdual before a conviction comes across as in the same poor taste as the articles this resembles. Yes, an argument could be made that the confession makes it fair, but it isn't the type of information I come to this site for.
The scope of Notebookcheck has expanded considerably in the recent years to include phones, EVs, eBikes, AI/ML, space science, and more. It's largely welcomed, but this article is a bridge too far. It's a move too close to the general media I avoid for mental health (I suspect I'm not the only one), and too far from the technical media that originally drew in my interest.
Please continue to introduce new technical topics to this site, but consider what readers might expect it not to be.