News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 laptop in review: Big screen, big battery, but not big on performance

Started by Redaktion, November 22, 2024, 21:47:27

Previous topic - Next topic

Redaktion

The Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G3 is the big guy among in the office: With a 16-inch screen, numpad and large 86 Wh battery, it is made to make people more productive. Sadly, the performance of this Lenovo laptop does not quite live up to our expectations.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Lenovo-ThinkPad-T16-Gen-3-laptop-in-review-Big-screen-big-battery-but-not-big-on-performance.921381.0.html

Plastic notebook disliker

I would list it as a big minus point that Lenovo still uses plastic for the case of such an expensive laptop.
Why does Lenovo use better materials for (cheaper) Lenovo Yoga and Lenovo ThinkBook laptops than for this one?
Why isn't there even an option for better materials?


Benjamin Herzig

Plastic is not per se worse than other materials. Cheap aluminum, as Lenovo uses on cheap Yoga and ThinkBook laptops, is definitely not a better choice. Those devices do not use the expensive CNC aluminum of more premium designs. They use aluminum as a trick to make it seem like a high quality design when it isn't.

Advantages of plastic:

- Cheaper

- More robust (because it flexes slightly, which means it does not break as quickly)

- Transparent to radio waves (which is very advantageous for a device with LTE)

- Not as heat conductive

The main disadvantage is that plastic feels cheaper, but that is merely perception and does not mean it is actually worse quality. And also, robust plastic designs tend to be thicker, which is also the case here.

To avoid it feeling cheap, Lenovo uses the rubbery-like coating. Plus, this device has an internal metal frame made out of magnesium, so it doesn't flex as much as a pure plastic-construction.

abc

Replaceable Lenovo keyboard is a fake advantage because cost (~90 EUR in EU) is higher than Hewlett Packard aluminium palmrest with keyboard for HP Elitebook and Zbooks. In older Thinkpads cost of replaceable keyboard was ~25 EUR. Assuming that older Thinkpad keyboards were much heavier and stiffer (higher cost of material and NOT made from recycleable plastics) something is wrong here even if we take into consideration higher energy and labour cost in China.

Benjamin Herzig

The cost per keyboard is higher because it is a backlight keyboard.

Replacing a whole palmrest is much harder to do, as you have to completely take the machine apart. Many users and companies won't do this complicated procedures and simply toss units with a defective keyboard. It definitely is not a "fake advantage".

Quick Reply

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview