The most shameful thing about these CAMMs is that they basically allow single-channel options.
Why do manufacturers need them? Remove old SO-DIMMs from the market at once, which are in bulk and cheap. This is the main selfish goal. These CAMMs do not provide any performance benefits, except for eliminating the backlog of DIMMs from the market for new models of mainstream laptops. They will still suffer from long and unreliable tracks to the memory controller in the processor and the frequencies will obviously be lower than the soldered memory, although it will also be of no use with the shameful 2 channels.
Until HBM3+ comes to laptops and PCs, there will be no sense - many cores are suffocating from slow RAM. Especially on the x86 platform, where the memory is shamefully slow even in top models.
Well, in fact, what is 256GB for a serious neural network? So, an insignificant trifle for kindergarten-level neural networks.
It should offer not 256GB, but 256TB. That's when it gets serious. Like a 100TB+ SSD.
Local neural networks, which are really useful to the average person, require hardware that is 2-3 orders of magnitude more powerful than what is currently available on the market.
Well, maybe today's children will live to reach such a level, given the dead end in silicon to which everything is inevitably heading. If there is a breakthrough with another computer architecture different from the classical Von Neumann.