Quote from: desss on April 14, 2024, 13:31:58Also the 3k display makes NO sense at all and it's only giving a lot of headaches while used in a multimonitor environment where this is the only one needing 175% scaling.
I have already written many times that developers are behaving like idiots, because only 4k is as comfortable as possible and is hardware compatible with 4k and fhd video with perfect pixel sharpness. And at the same time it has a scaling of 200%. Moreover, if anyone wants to play 4K, it can easily be switched to fhd with a decrease in the load on the gpu by exactly 4 times, with a sharp increase in fps.
It is clearly visible that the vile Lenovo marketers are deliberately forcing Lenovo engineers (or rather black slaves) to do similar nonsense, as with idiotic 2.5k screens that are also completely incompatible with 4k and fhd video.
For 5 years now, all laptop screens have been required to be only 4K and nothing else. With the same ppi as on smartphones, especially considering that Google deliberately spoils the eyesight of all people who use Chrome-like browsers for Windows with non-disabled cloudy text black and white anti-aliasing, which I have proven many times.
To prevent your eyes from getting tired and to avoid endless harmful refocusing from the text to its pixel structure (which should not be visible at all) due to the slightest movement of the head closer to the screen and back, ppi should be no lower than 220-230. And this is only possible with 4k screens at 15.6"+.
At the same time, 4k monitors are not enough and there is a minimum of only 8k. But to the shame of the entire IT industry, there are still no discrete cards or igpus with real support for DP2.0+ in UHBR20 (80Gbps) mode, in which you can get 8k resolution in lossless mode.
These are sad facts when the capitalist greed of the owners of large corporations deliberately slows down progress on planet Earth and spoils the health and vision of billions of people.