I struggle to understand where this Switch 2 "controversy" comes from? There is a new Switch in development. That's been mentioned on Nintendo's quarterly calls. It hasn't been announced, but investors have noticed that the Switch has been on sale for nearly 7 long years. The Tegra 239 variant has been long discussed as the most likely SOC to run Switch NG, so nothing controversial there. T239 also incorporates Amphere GPU architecture, which is more than suitable for Switch NG graphics performance, estimated to be 6x-8x performance improvement over Switch, whose SOC was originally released in 2015. Lastly, because the CPU/GPU architectures are incredibly similar, with additional graphics extensions supported by Amphere, backwards compatibility would be as straightforward as it ever could, ensuring that legacy games are supported and could even be improved w/o huge commitments by devs to provide those enhanced visuals that Nintendo is banking on selling Switch NG products. This is the easiest no-brainer decision in the history of game consoles. It allows Nintendo to simply extend the Switch's legacy of 120+ million sold, while offering just enough improvement to encourage fence sitters to migrant to Switch 2 with zero pain. At the end of the day, Nintendo wants to continue making profits by the path of least resistance and nVidia has provided exactly that with T239. Why there's any controversy at all is just a by product of the times.