News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

AMD launches Radeon Pro W7900 48 GB and Pro W7800 32 GB professional RDNA3 GPUs

Started by Redaktion, April 13, 2023, 17:31:19

Previous topic - Next topic

Redaktion

The Pro W7900 model is based on the same Navi 31 chip equipping the RX 7900 XTX gaming cards, but it comes with 48 GB of GDDR6 ECC VRAM that really come in handy in AI-driven applications. On the other hand, the more affordable Pro W7800 solution offers only 32 GB VRAM and comes with a 256-bit memory bus, which could be indicative of a Navi 32 chip.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-launches-Radeon-Pro-W7900-48-GB-and-Pro-W7800-32-GB-professional-RDNA3-GPUs.707074.0.html

Game XGR ᵖʳᶦᶜᵉ/ᵖᵉʳᶠ ᶠᵀᵂ

AMD often launches PRO variants with twice the VRAM of their gaming counterparts, so I am hopefull N32u undercuts the RTX 4070 while exceeding it in VRAM and performance.

NikoB

Well, my congratulations to the public of the planet - these are the first graphics cards to support 8k monitors. True, alas, so far only in 60 Hz, because. for 120 and even more so 144Hz +, you will need from 160Gbps to 250Gbps. It is obvious that it is hardly possible to do this at a distance of 1.5-2m over a conventional copper cable. We are waiting for the transition of all monitors to a hybrid cord - with an optical link inside for the signal and a regular copper one for the power bus. I don't see any other way.

It remains to wait for the first 8k monitors.

It is especially pleasant that even 32 "16:10 monitors will receive at least 283 ppi, i.e. a crystal clear picture in 8k, and it is especially pleasant that Evil Corporation will finally be defeated - Google with its damned Chrome browser, in which ppi is lower about 220 - fonts are always blurry (since version 50) due to incorrect grayscale anti-aliasing with extra shadows, which cannot be turned off, like in Firefox (where fonts are perfectly sharp and do not spoil people's eyesight), which is imperceptible only on smartphones, so how is it that ppi is always above 300 and that's why Google doesn't care about the eyes of owners of monitors and laptops with ppi less than 200, because they have the main audience for monetization, on smartphones with android.

And shame on NVidia/Intel for their poor DP1.4 ports everywhere, even in top-end cards.
Let me remind you that the full version of the DP2.0 standard was released in the distant pre-war and pre-Covid 2019...

Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview