Apple confirms the date and time for its "Peek Performance" event

[Redaktion]

Apple has begun sending out invites for its first event of 2022 called "Peek Performance". The company is slated to launch a new iPhone, iPad and MacBooks powered by the M2 chip. One can watch it on March 8 at 10:00 PST.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-confirms-the-date-and-time-for-its-Peek-Performance-event.605705.0.html

[RobertJasiek]

"167:100 >> laptop, desktop, tv"

Do you want to say "The aspect ratio 167:100 applies to laptop, desktop, tv" or "...should apply..."?

"167:73 >> mobile"

I have got no idea what you might mean by "mobile".

"167:127 >> pad"

Do you mean tablets? Are you saying that 167:127 should be their aspect ratio?

"167:154 >> watch"

Watches have that ratio or do you say that they should have it?

"154:167 >> foldable mobile"

Are you saying that whatever foldable mobile devices are there, they should have the aspect ratio 154:167?

Why do you suggest three digit numbers? Are single or two digit ratios not good enough?

Why do you suggest exactly these ratios?

[size sense correlation]

screen aspect ratio:
166:100 (horizontal length:vertical length) >> laptop, desktop, tv
166:74 (vertical length:horizontal length) >> mobile
166:126 (horizontal length:vertical length) >> tablet (landscape)
166:152 (vertical length:horizontal length) >> watch
166:152 (horizontal length:vertical length) >> foldable mobile (when open)

"167:100 >> laptop, desktop, tv"

Do you want to say "The aspect ratio 167:100 applies to laptop, desktop, tv" or "...should apply..."?

"167:73 >> mobile"

I have got no idea what you might mean by "mobile".

"167:127 >> pad"

Do you mean tablets? Are you saying that 167:127 should be their aspect ratio?

"167:154 >> watch"

Watches have that ratio or do you say that they should have it?

"154:167 >> foldable mobile"

Are you saying that whatever foldable mobile devices are there, they should have the aspect ratio 154:167?

Why do you suggest three digit numbers? Are single or two digit ratios not good enough?

Why do you suggest exactly these ratios?

[screen aspect ratio]

                  >> horizontal:vertical
mobile            >> 74:166
mobile flip       >> 126:333 (126:166.5 folded)
mobile fold       >> 166:139 (83:139 folded)
monitor           >> 166:100
monitor double    >> 333:126
monitor triple    >> 499:139
tablet (portrait) >> 126:166
watch             >> 139:166

"167:100 >> laptop, desktop, tv"

Do you want to say "The aspect ratio 167:100 applies to laptop, desktop, tv" or "...should apply..."?

"167:73 >> mobile"

I have got no idea what you might mean by "mobile".

"167:127 >> pad"

Do you mean tablets? Are you saying that 167:127 should be their aspect ratio?

"167:154 >> watch"

Watches have that ratio or do you say that they should have it?

"154:167 >> foldable mobile"

Are you saying that whatever foldable mobile devices are there, they should have the aspect ratio 154:167?

Why do you suggest three digit numbers? Are single or two digit ratios not good enough?

Why do you suggest exactly these ratios?

[166]

                  >> horizontal:vertical
mobile            >> 77:166
flip mobile       >> 73:166 (73:83 folded)
fold mobile       >> 166:153 (83:153 folded)
monitor           >> 166:100
double monitor    >> 333:126
triple monitor    >> 499:139
tablet (portrait) >> 126:166
watch             >> 139:166

"167:100 >> laptop, desktop, tv"

Do you want to say "The aspect ratio 167:100 applies to laptop, desktop, tv" or "...should apply..."?

"167:73 >> mobile"

I have got no idea what you might mean by "mobile".

"167:127 >> pad"

Do you mean tablets? Are you saying that 167:127 should be their aspect ratio?

"167:154 >> watch"

Watches have that ratio or do you say that they should have it?

"154:167 >> foldable mobile"

Are you saying that whatever foldable mobile devices are there, they should have the aspect ratio 154:167?

Why do you suggest three digit numbers? Are single or two digit ratios not good enough?

Why do you suggest exactly these ratios?

[all166]

                  >> horizontal:vertical
mobile            >> 80:166
flip mobile       >> 73:166 (73:83 folded)
fold mobile       >> 166:153 (83:153 folded)
monitor           >> 166:100
double monitor    >> 333:126
triple monitor    >> 499:139
tablet (portrait) >> 113:166
watch             >> 139:166

"167:100 >> laptop, desktop, tv"

Do you want to say "The aspect ratio 167:100 applies to laptop, desktop, tv" or "...should apply..."?

"167:73 >> mobile"

I have got no idea what you might mean by "mobile".

"167:127 >> pad"

Do you mean tablets? Are you saying that 167:127 should be their aspect ratio?

"167:154 >> watch"

Watches have that ratio or do you say that they should have it?

"154:167 >> foldable mobile"

Are you saying that whatever foldable mobile devices are there, they should have the aspect ratio 154:167?

Why do you suggest three digit numbers? Are single or two digit ratios not good enough?

Why do you suggest exactly these ratios?