Quote from: Rav4 on May 31, 2022, 20:45:50This is bogus.. everyone knows last 5% perf takes 20-30% more power. Power efficiency tests should be done when we have tests doing exactly same work... the faster processor will idle faster and save battery... notebook check needs to send their author to some computer science 101 class
Its much worse then that... Look up the Whisper mode numbers.
The CPU loses 50% performance but it using ~233 a 250% less power. The main reason being that the CPU is forced to use reduced frequency and thus better performance.
The race for faster and faster frequencies just kills performance. Wait for Zen4 and enjoy the s*** show that 5.5Ghz will become. People expecting that TSMC 5nm its 20% power saving compared to 7nm, are in for a rude awaking when a 5.5Ghz mobile CPU will be more power hungry, despite the advanced node power saving. Sure, you will gain maybe 15% performance from the higher frequency but you will be spending easily another 300% of power draw on that 4.7 -> 5.5Ghz range.
That is the problem when CPU's are made with desktop first strategy, where power is not a issue. Need more power? Well, just increase the TDP target to 170W ( Zen 4 ) or like Intel 240W+. And then try to downscale that same technology down to mobile platforms.
Apple their M1's are this efficient because they are designed for a mobile platform first, where you need to first look at each feature, what power does it use and what benefit does it give you. Unlike our PC platform, where its first what performance does it give and that is it. Because benchmark winning is more important then power saving, as our world waste energy everywhere. 70W ~ 100W idle PC's, no problem. That is what PC's used to do, when fully loaded on ancient nodes!!! A lot of our performance has come at the cost of power. And lets not look at NVIDIA/AMD GPU's with NVIDIA wanting 600W power connectors for their GPU's. Insanity!