Quote from: VZR on November 14, 2022, 00:54:51Laptops are portable PCs. Higher resolution means higher energy consumption. Potential buyers from the main focus group don't need it as it would sip too much energy.
You're lying. Because 90% of users use laptops (especially with discrete chips) from the outlet without caring about autonomy. Because they simply replace them at home and at work with desktops in the form of a mobile workplace - from outlet to outlet. The consumption of a 4K panel is ridiculous, and the price is only $30 higher than a 2.5K panel.
90% of users use laptops (especially with discrete chips) from the outlet without caring about autonomy. Because they simply replace them at home and at work with desktops in the form of a mobile workplace - from outlet to outlet. The consumption of a 4K panel is ridiculous, and the price is only $30 higher than a 2.5K panel.
Quote from: VZR on November 14, 2022, 00:54:51Besides, many people purchased a separate monitor for a home use during the COVID pandemic. Why would one still ask for a built-in 4K marketing BS nowadays? Content creators? Are they in the main focus group?
This is nonsense, because in the case of connecting a laptop to an external monitor, the whole point of a laptop is lost - a quick mobile change of place at home and carry out on another place. A good 4k panel (it easy switch to 1080p/60Hz for battery mode) with a B2W/G2G response of less than 10ms should be in every universal work laptop, and even more so in a gaming laptop.
Quote from: VZR on November 14, 2022, 00:54:51Forget it, soldered 16 gigs of RAM are everywhere, there are considered as a part of a "standard" config.
Another nonsense. The mainstream DDR4 3200 now costs $80-90 for 32Gb, which is just a penny considering the general price of laptops from the category of universal-working ones, i.e. mainstream models. DDR5 costs +50-60% more today, but few people need it yet (and the speed increase does not match its price, i.e. it will quickly fall in price). Do not solder at least 32GB+ or do not have 2 slots - cynical and redneck manufacturers and nothing more. The greed of manufacturers in this matter is phenomenal.
Quote from: VZR on November 14, 2022, 00:54:51This means extra $$$ for the second M.2 connector, higher PCB design complexity and so on.
The wiring of a large wholesale batch of motherboards for 2 connectors - within the cost of one motherboard - costs a penny. These are purely marketing perversions.
Quote from: VZR on November 14, 2022, 00:54:51TB stuff is owned by Intel, the licence costs money.
Nonsense. A license per laptop costs a few cents. At times more expensive is the power hardware for TB4/USB40 logic in SoCs on mainboards, but again - against the backdrop of the overall price of a laptop, this all costs a penny (external TB3/4 controller with power circuits for this on mainboard is retail cost ~+$35-40 for laptop from 2018!). Again, deliberate marketing restrictions-perversions. Let me remind you that the TB controller is now built into both Intel and AMD SoCs, i.e. the laptop buyer obviously overpays for the SoC logic for TB controllers, which the bastard laptop manufacturers do not allow it to use for many lmodels. Even funny Pentium Gold 7505 have TB4.0 logic! Therefore, the price of a TB4.0/USB40 port output is not higher than $15-20 per laptop. This is again nonsense against the background of the general price of most mainstream laptops, especially "gaming" models. In this case, lower the price of processors minus this logic. Make a release processors with cheaper versions without TB4/USB40. Ok? Where are they don't do it? We are being deliberately peddled with solutions that are suboptimal in price. This is vile and is a fraud in practice, thanks to the illiteracy of most of the world's population in understanding what they are being sold and how much it really costs from factory. Intel and AMD deliberately stuff SoCs with a bunch of unnecessary logic to justify the inflated price of their processors. But laptop manufacturers do not output this logic (for which we are forced to pay Intel and AMD anyway, because we cannot refuse it and buy options without it) on external ports. This is complete bestiality in reality. And a lot of people don't understand this. That's the problem. Because they are technically illiterate, and many in the Western world have too much easy money (credit at the state level) to ignore the obviously inflated price. At the same time, in third world countries, prices are even higher than in the US with lower incomes!
Quote from: VZR on November 14, 2022, 00:54:51HDMI 2.1 may require at least a dGPU
You again betray your complete technical illiteracy - all Intel SoCs have had at least 2 years of built-in support for HDMI 2.1, like AMD since Zen3+. And DP2.0 from 2021/2022 (half version).
Quote from: VZR on November 14, 2022, 00:54:51too expensive
Another illiterate and obsessive statement, not supported by anything by technical arguments, which I have proven in practice.
Quote from: VZR on November 14, 2022, 00:54:51Who needs 80 GB/s for browsing?
Everyone without exception. In order not to spoil the view with cloudy fonts in chrome at low ppi. To be sharp because of the idiot developers at Google, you need a ppi above about 220. This is provided on diagonals of 25 "+ only 8k panels. It is they who forever close the theme of sharp and clear fonts in Chromium-based browsers with diagonals from 23 to 32" approximately, i.e. the largest segment. Now people are just ruining their vision with blurry wrong greyscale anti-aliasing because of the idiots in Chrome's development department and the browsers on its engine.
If these bastards in development centers do not solve the problem intentionally, although there are dozens of accurate descriptions from professionals about this common problem in bug-trackers for many years, then it needs to be circumvented in a rough way - a sharp increase in ppi to the level of smartphones on laptop panels and monitor panels. For 15.6-17, 4k is enough, but for monitors, 8k resolution has been required for 8 years for everyone without exception. Everyone needs it.
Quote from: VZR on November 14, 2022, 00:54:51COVID made OEMs improve from crappy 720p to supreme 1080p, should be good enough for most users
Hahaha, you are again writing utter nonsense. 90% of laptops have pathetic 720p today.
Even the vaunted Legion 5 Pro 2022 has a 720p camera! WTF?! Lenovo?!
notebookcheck.net/For-gamers-and-content-creators-Lenovo-Legion-5-Pro-Notebook-Review.637076.0.html
Once again, for illiterate laymen - the minimum quality camera for quality video conferences - 2560x1440@60fps with a codec of at least H265/AV1(and very good if next H266 for 2023) level (but with support H264/VP9 for back compability) and good sensetive sensor and light/sharp optics and fast autofocus. And nothing else. This should be the INDUSTRIAL standard for 2 years on all laptops! After 4k-8k selfi cameras on smartphones, shameful even 1080p on top laptops of 2022 cause nothing but Homeric laughter and contempt for those who design them.
Quote from: VZR on November 14, 2022, 00:54:51If laptops with the latest mobile AMD chips is not available in your country of residence / region, it doesn't mean they don't exist at all.
Again lies. I proved many times in various comments over a long time that in all markets there are no multiple options for competitive 15.6-17.3" models with 6600U/6800U, as well as with Alder Lake (but there are more options, which is why Intel took back almost 7% in a year market share of an inefficient AMD company, and rightly so). Even in the USA - the main market of the planet, you can't buy anything, just open a search engine. All that is interesting and adequate - "Out of Stock". Why is it so, on the supposedly laptop market that is falling like a jack, where supposedly all the warehouses are crammed with products? Maybe they're filled with crap and not what people need?