So let me see. I should buy a 16-core 24-thread processor to brag about a slight increase in single-core performance over the competition and practically negligable multi-core throughout. Oh, and apparently I should expect a HUGE energy draw to boot.
Forget it. AMD is also onto the next iteration of Ryzen; it's not like Bulldozer where we had an inferior approach clutching at straws playing catch-up. AMD is aiming higher and further than this. Let's also remember that AMD has nowhere near the resources of Intel.
Then there's gaming. Most games are already GPU-limited especially when running at 4K. What possible gain can a boiler of a CPU offer that will be practical, and affordable?
It is my opinion that any lead Intel has here including minor, will be short-lived. AMD is already aiming to hit above this weight.
My only gripe is pricing and availability. If I was AMD I'd release a Ryzen 5600 maybe even with that extra cache and all at a stellar prices (£229). Keep the think unlocked and let it clock to oblivion. Pair it with a decent mid-range GPU and boomshanka: somthing most people can afford, and is available, and offers plenty of extra oomph given a better cooler.
So in short. What does Intel offer here either itself or AMD doesn't already offer? I am simply not going to buy a huge PSU just to brag about single-threaded superiority because in real terms I've won and still lost.