It's sad it took a WSJ journalist mentioning it for them to finally act, because it's been known for a long, long time that this stuff happens, so their action was not prompted by being made aware of it, but by getting publicity about it. And as mentioned, there almost certainly is at least some ulterior motive here for Amazon to eliminate competition to their own brands. Action definitely needed to be taken, only years sooner and probably with some sort of third-party arbiter, to ensure Amazon isn't using their power unfairly, not to mention that it seems unlikely they've banned so many companies and didn't ban at least a couple undeservingly in the process, and from what I've read about Amazon, if that were to happen, there would be no recourse for the companies.
My first thought regarding this was that these companies will just open up stores/brands or sell under different names, which seems to be the Chinese modus operandi even pre-ban. It's amazing how often I see the same exact product sold under half a dozen different brandings. And it appears from Shiny's comment that is exactly what's happening.
Quote from: FND UiTM on September 19, 2021, 16:33:13
Another, bullish action from a big tech company. Every company has it's tactics for getting a 5 star review. They were only straightforward because they don't understand the culture that much.Just give them a warning or a fine. Band permenantly? More like getting rid of the competition
There are acceptable tactics and then there are straight-up unethical, deceptive tactics. These companies have been doing this stuff for years, have received warnings, have caused Amazon to change the rules to try and curb it, and have continued doing it. Not to mention they (presumably) read and signed a contract with Amazon agreeing to act a certain way. If they didn't read it or didn't fully understand it, that's on them. I'm not sure why their ignorance, willful or otherwise, which causes harm to untold numbers of consumers, should be allowed to continue. And that's exactly what would happen if they received a warning, because they already have received warnings, and because they clearly can't comprehend the rules in the first place, so what's the likelihood they'll understand the warning? Meanwhile, if they're warned, and continue, more consumers will buy products with artificially high ratings that may or may not actually be as good as the ratings suggest. I'm tired of the lack of accountability everywhere.