Quote from: L on March 27, 2021, 14:44:23
@Gustafson
Well I did not have trouble with installing drivers for Intel or Nvidia after OEMs stopped supporting those devices while with AND I could not install their mobile gpu drivers if they were not modded. My point is that AMD only recently buckled to support their mobile solutions and not push it on OEMs so maybe said OEMs are wary of this and other problems we don't know about..
AMD didn't have a compelling mobile product since the old Acer Ferrari One until recently.
Ryzen 5 2500u was good, but didn't really give much battery life. 3500u was better, but still battery life was bad.
4xxx series was better than what intel had to offer in every single way.
Now back to your claims.
Did you buy a bulldozer(any generation from Trinity to Carrizo) based laptop?
I didn't. So I don't know how they managed the drivers. But from what I heard, the gpu drivers were always better than what intel offered.
And you say the OEMs are wary of amd.
They are still not wary of intel that sold them chips with meltdown and spectre knowingly for years.
They made Kabylake with the same security flaws and released it after the flaws were revealed...
Intel has been affected by over 248 security issues, some at hardware level and that can't be fixed and some getting serious performance hits when you apply patches.
But the OEMs trust them enough to include them in business laptops. But they are wary of amd's drivers.
😂🤣😂🤣😂😂