News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Snapdragon 888 vs Kirin 9000: Xiaomi Mi 11 tops the final AnTuTu flagship smartphone performance chart of 2020 ahead of the Huawei Mate 40 Pro+

Started by Redaktion, January 05, 2021, 08:24:18

Previous topic - Next topic

Redaktion

AnTuTu has published its December 2020 Android flagship smartphone performance chart and the Xiaomi Mi 11 with the Snapdragon 888 has managed to take the top spot away from the Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ with the Kirin 9000. The Snapdragon 888 vs Kirin 9000 results were very close, but the Mi 11's 2K 120 Hz display tipped the difference.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Snapdragon-888-vs-Kirin-9000-Xiaomi-Mi-11-tops-the-final-AnTuTu-flagship-smartphone-performance-chart-of-2020-ahead-of-the-Huawei-Mate-40-Pro.513123.0.html

What

The performance of kirin 9000 that has cortex a77 can keep close to the SOC that has cortex x1 & a78?
What a78

S.Yu

Quote from: What on January 05, 2021, 11:38:07
The performance of kirin 9000 that has cortex a77 can keep close to the SOC that has cortex x1 & a78?
What a78
Samsung's 5nm is far behind TSMC's 5nm, actually it's very close to TSMC's latest 7nm, so the SD888 is almost a node behind because of that.

What

Quote from: S.Yu on January 05, 2021, 19:39:46
Quote from: What on January 05, 2021, 11:38:07
The performance of kirin 9000 that has cortex a77 can keep close to the SOC that has cortex x1 & a78?
What a78
Samsung's 5nm is far behind TSMC's 5nm, actually it's very close to TSMC's latest 7nm, so the SD888 is almost a node behind because of that.
I thought sd888 use 5nm's TSMC, i didn't know that

S.Yu

Quote from: What on January 06, 2021, 02:22:08
Quote from: S.Yu on January 05, 2021, 19:39:46
Quote from: What on January 05, 2021, 11:38:07
The performance of kirin 9000 that has cortex a77 can keep close to the SOC that has cortex x1 & a78?
What a78
Samsung's 5nm is far behind TSMC's 5nm, actually it's very close to TSMC's latest 7nm, so the SD888 is almost a node behind because of that.
I thought sd888 use 5nm's TSMC, i didn't know that
There's actually rumor that SD888+ may switch back to TSMC. Probably supply issues, ultimately.


Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview